Stuffed tiger in Paris (France) shop -- by yodelodelay
The laws on big cats and their "ownership" in America need to be dramatically simplified, unified and tightened up. What made me think about that? The severed head of a tiger lying on the road side in Lakemoor, that's what. I don't live in American. I like America and Americans (by and large) but I don't like the sloppy approach to the keeping of big cats.
View Larger Map
There are 12,000 tigers in America and 7,000 left in the wild worldwide - say no more. A lot of these big cats are in private possession, with individuals and I guess the individual who lost his tiger head was one of these people. He was driving to get it stuffed. It fell off the lorry. The police became involved. It was not clear (at least at one time) whether it was legal to have the cat in the first place. It was clear though that it is illegal to keep a tiger on private property without a permit. So permits are obviously granted sometimes. It is illegal to import "certain big cats" across State lines or the U.S. border (federal Captive Wildlife Safety Act). Zoos and certain organizations are exempt. But the Act does not ban "big feline ownership". 19 States of the United States prohibit private possession of "dangerous cats" ( I presume that includes all big cats).
Do you get a feel for the difficulties in figuring out what the laws on big cats is throughout America? I am confused, certainly. Bearing in mind the dire state of the tiger in the wild and the lack of overall commitment that there is in the world to save the tiger in the wild why can't the laws in the USA be amended to take this into account?
For example, this is my suggestion as a starter on Laws on Big Cats:
- There is one federal law for all States with no possibility to add, amend or supplement the law State wide or locally. I am going to presume that this is legally possible and if not why not?
- This federal law, prohibits throughout the USA, the keeping of any big cat unless by an approved reserve, conservation program or zoo.
- Those who currently keep big cats privately are to pay a fee (may be this already happens) and this fee goes into the direct "on the ground" (sharp end) funding of programs concerned with the preservation of big cats in the wild. The fee is high. Those who don't want to keep big cats under this protocol must continue to do so for a minimum of one year from the enactment of the federal law and thereafter surrender the cat to the authorities under a controlled program.
- There be no further keeping of big cats privately
- Those who currently keep big cats privately must pay a fee or a higher fee to do so.
- When the present big cats in private hands die naturally there can be no further acquisitions of big cats by these people
- All fees go to conservation as stated at 3 above.
These are the words of the video maker: "At the Tiger Truckstop near Baton Rouge, Louisiana, not only do they keep Tony, a live tiger kept in a crummy little cage exposed to the freeway, their restaurant keeps a stuffed white tiger above .." I don't think he'll mind me quoting him. This is his YouTube Channel (his YouTube home page): http://www.youtube.com/user/journeyman47
We all give up some of our rights in a community. We have to to make it work. It is time we allowed the animals of the world some dignity and gave them back some of their rights, some of the basic rights such as a right to life, that they possessed before humankind trampled all over the planet, destroying it, and took those rights away.
Laws on Big Cats to Wild Cat Species
Laws on big cats - photo: