Monday 16 September 2024

Was the latest Trump attempted assassination set up by Trump himself?

OPINION: It's all over the news as expected. Trump targeted again in attempted assassination. The presidential candidate declares that he is "safe and well" after a suspected gunmen was arrested near his golf club.


When he plays golf there are Secret Service personnel ahead scanning the environment for potential assassins which in this case worked because they spotted an AK-47 automatic weapon in bushes. A man was spotted as Trump played golf at his West Palm Beach resort in Florida.

Secret Service agents fired at the unnamed man but they are unclear whether he is a suspect. A suspect was stopped in their car about 45 miles from the discovery. 

No shots were fired at Donald Trump but the law enforcement personnel shot at the man as I understand it.

The AK-47 was found in bushes and they found two backpacks, a rifle scope and a Go Pro camera which had been attached to a fence.

The president was between 300-500 yards from the gunmen at the time. That's within the range of being shot when using a scope.

The video below explains fully.

So the big news is that Donald Trump escaped another assassination. The last time there was an attempt on his life he took the opportunity to leverage that event by wearing an oversize plaster on his ear and declaring to the world that he was immortal or something like that. And that they could never kill him and he would go on fighting for America for the rest of his life to which his followers roared in delight.

On this occasion Trump, 78, said in a statement: There were gunshots in my vicinity [presumably the gunshots of the Secret Service personnel not the gunmen!] But before rumours start spiralling out of control I wanted you to hear this first: I AM SAFE AND WELL! Nothing will slow me down. I will NEVER SURRENDER! I will always love you for supporting me."

Inspiring words. No?

The question being asked in news media is whether this event will boost his flagging campaign. The general trend is towards Harris to win the presidential election and I wonder if Donald Trump has been seeking some major event to swing votes towards him at the last minute. And I wonder if he came up with the idea of another attempted assassination. That's an allegation and suggestion no more.

It is not beyond the bounds of possibility to suggest this. It's an idea I had this morning. I don't know whether anybody else has had the same idea. It would of course involve the participation of this alleged gunmen. But if that gunmen was paid a few million dollars and if he was fairly sure he could get away, I think there are men who would do that.

So, today's conspiracy theory is that Trump arranged this attempted assassination in order to boost his presidential campaign. It's not just me who is actually suggesting that this event could reignite his campaign. The Times has reported that "His campaign last night wasted little time in sending out an email to supporters, asking for more money, but whether yesterday's instant leads to a change in his electoral chances remains doubtful."

Yes, doubtful but possible.


---------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Owner of world's TRUE oldest cat didn't bother to apply to Guinness World Records

The true oldest domestic cat in the world (probably) has, according to a report in The Times today, just passed over the rainbow bridge at the age of 33. Her name was Rosie and she lived with her owner, Lila Brissett, in a ground floor flat. 

Owner of true world's oldest cat didn't bother to apply to Guinness World Records
Lila Brissett and Rosie. Image: The Mirror newspaper.

Rosie turned 33 on June 1 this year which made her 152 years old in human terms. The interesting story for me about Rosie is that Guinness World Records sent Rosie's owner an application form to apply for the world's oldest cat but she never completed it. ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ˜ƒ

Lila Brissett, a widower, said she was heartbroken about losing Rosie. She added that she misses her "so much". Lila says she never wanted to have Rosie euthanised and therefore Rosie died of natural causes. Lila said this about her death: "She wasn't very well and one day she just walked into the hallway of the house, laid it down and passed away."

She added that: "There were lots of good memories though and I'm happy we had our time together."

As you might expect in her old age Rosie became very particular and had a very set routine which was to eat and go to her favourite spot by the window where she would stay all day and sleep and snooze. She insisted on eating Purina One cat food. If she didn't get it she kicked up a fuss.

Lila was naturally concerned about Rosie's passing over the rainbow bridge because she had lived with her for 33 years and "She'll leave a big void".

Rosie was adopted as a shelter kitten from a rescue centre because the family who own Rosie had a cat allergy we are told.

She was approached by the rescue centre because she had previously rescued an abuse cat and dog from them.

Rosie's mother was a grey Ragdoll according to this report (The Times) who mated with a ginger tom. Rosie was a longhaired cat with a very fluffy coat.

The oldest domestic cat ever was called Creme Puff from Austin, Texas, USA. She was born in 1967 and died in August 2005 having lived an impressive 38 years and three days.

The story implies that the Guinness World Records reports of the oldest cat are not necessarily the true oldest cats because it does rely upon an application being made by the owner. There will probably be thousands of very old cats out there right now who could be in the Guinness World Records book but are not. The current oldest cat is 28 years old. Her name is Flossie. It's probably true that another cat somewhere is older than that.

---------------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Sunday 15 September 2024

From the outside Polish firefighters rescue a cat stuck in a window on the 7th floor

Polish firefighters rescue a cat stuck in window on 7th floor of an apartment block from the outside of the building which is very unusual. Some fighters don't do this as it is expensive and for some administrations a waste of public funds.

The rescue looks tricky. I have estimated that it is the 7th floor. I don't see a cat carrier on the cherry picker. And we don't know why the cat needed rescuing except to guess that the owner was away and the cat somehow became trapped in the window. He/she was released with the help of a metal bar.

My guess is that the window opens by rocking around a central axis and the cat walked on the window to get out because the owner was away for a long time. The window rocked on its axis and trapped the cat between the window and the frame. The cat then cried out and the fire service was called by a neighbour in the block. Just guessing and speculating.


Separately, there is currently severe flooding in parts of Poland so there will be many pets who need rescuing and who have been rescued and probably some who've died. Let's think of them and wish them the best of luck.

-----------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

JD Vance pours gasoline on the Haitian cat eating story and gets badly burned

Surprisingly, and in another poor decision by the Trump/Vance partnership, JD Vance has continued to pour gasoline on the discredited migrant cat eating story by posting on his Twitter/X feed (with 1.9 million followers) a video of poultry being cooked on an outdoor grill while claiming that domestic cats were being cooked in preparation for an outdoor meal in Ohio!

JD Vance. Image: Wikipedia.

The video accompanied the following words: "Kamala Harris and her media apparatchiks should be ashamed of themselves. Another debunked story that turned out to have merit."


You may remember that JD Vance had claimed falsely that Haitians in Springfield, Ohio were stealing domestic cats and eating them. There are many Haitian immigrants (I believe that they are legal immigrants) in Springfield, Ohio a town of 58,000 citizens. And I believe that the indigenous citizens have become annoyed by this 20,000 influx and have created this false scenario on social media which went viral.

Trump and Vance grabbed hold of it is a useful story to emphasise their desire to stop illegal immigration and that they are the duo best suited for this task. But they dug a big hole for themselves. And in this instance JD Vance has apparently got burnt by throwing gasoline on an already simmering fire.

The Independent newspaper tells us that this video was originally posted by the right-wing Manhattan Institute's Christopher Rufo, who apparently offered a $5,000 bounty to anyone that could provide proof of cat eating migrants in Ohio.

The newspaper is able to tell us that the footage was filmed last year in Dayton according to Rufo who has spoken to the person who made the video. The person who shot the video said that "some Africans that stay right next door to my kid's mother". And Rufo insists that the claims were verified i.e. that cats were being eaten, by "multiple witnesses and visual cross-references." 

His article states that the video shows "a pair of flayed cats on a blue barbecue in Dayton Ohio".

Note: Haiti is not in Africa! It is in the Caribbean.

The reaction was rapid on social media. The general tenor of the criticisms is that chickens were being cooked and they were surprised that Rufo and JD Vance was unable to tell the difference between chickens and cats who reposted the video.

Here's an example: " “I find it strange that a self-professed ‘hillbilly’ doesn’t know what whole chickens look like."

And another example in capital letters to emphasise the point!: “HOW DO YOU NOT KNOW WHAT CHICKENS LOOK LIKE WITH THEIR LEGS ATTACHED YOU F****ING DIPSHIT.”

The Independent reached out to Rufo for a comment but he did not respond. Also, the JD Vance campaign declined to comment. And an expert at the National Chicken Council did not reply to requests to comment.

However, somebody close to JD Vance told the newspaper that they did not believe the carcasses to be grilled were chickens. The Independent newspaper journalist writes that "a visual comparison of skinned cats prepared for laboratory use and whole plucked chickens suggested the animals in the video are almost certainly not feline."

The story is both bizarre and sickening actually. We have to discuss, in this story, skinned cats being grilled in a backyard in Ohio. It makes me want to puke.

This is another escalation in this ridiculous story and it very strongly appears that JD Vance is digging a bigger hole for himself and the Tramp campaign. He's thrown gasoline on the embers of a fire that was fizzling out nicely and now it is back in flames in the headlines.

----------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Saturday 14 September 2024

Pope Francis asks America's Roman Catholics to vote for Harris or Trump based on WHO IS THE LESSER EVIL!

OPINION: Pope Francis has unexpectedly and uncommonly dived into the American presidential election campaign and suggested that America's 52 million Roman Catholics should make a decision about who to support on the basis of the presidential candidates' views on abortion and immigration and who therefore is the 'lesser evil'.

Pope Francis pontificating about God knows what. Excuse the double pun. Image: Reuters.

We know that Kamala Harris has vowed to sign any legislation passed by Congress that would restore national protections for abortion access which was struck down by the Supreme Court two years ago under the then President Trump.

In Trump we know that he is very strong on illegal immigration. He has consistently said that he will crack down on illegal immigration and deport millions of immigrants who made it to the United States.

And Pope Francis said that both issues are about life. The lives of unborn babies and the lives of immigrants. You decide what's more important. He doesn't know the answer. He said that Roman Catholics must choose the lesser evil.

"You must choose the lesser evil. Who is the lesser evil? That lady, or that gentleman? I don't know."

So he's asking people to decide whether Harris is better than Trump or Trump is better than Harris in terms of overall character. But to refer to Harris as evil is mad. ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ˜’

Well, Pope Francis is entirely wrong in asking Roman Catholics to decide on the character of Trump and Harris on the basis of their policies on immigration and abortion.

You have to decide on a person's character on a full spectrum of behaviours. On what they say and do over a long period of time.

And when you do that you are forced to come to the only possible conclusion namely that Kamala Harris is a far better person than Donald Trump.

I realise that a lot of Americans worship him (I respect that) but Donald Trump has clearly demonstrated that he lacks integrity. For example, you might think it minor but he cheats at golf. Anybody who does that lacks integrity. And we know he lies. And we know that he is a misogynistic egocentric twit. Plus he is a convicted criminal for God's sake. We know is a bad decision-maker judging by the last presidential debate. What more do we need?

And we know that Kamala Harris has a very strong record on animal welfare throughout her personal and professional life - a sign of a good character. She has a good face. She has a face which beams integrity in my view. I think we can read faces and I think faces project a person's personality. That's why I say she has a good face. She has integrity. She is normal. She is balanced. She wants to do the right thing. She hasn't got an ego as big as a house. She isn't narcissistic. She is decent.

These are the issues when deciding who the better person is. Donald Trump wants to build a wall to block immigrants to America. I understand the concerns about mass illegal immigration to America. They are very great concerns but I think we have to ask ourselves whether we would do the same thing as these immigrants if we lived in crappy countries and wanted to improve our lives. I would certainly go north from South and Central America and try and get into the US. It's normal.

As for abortion, this is a very polarised topic. But the general consensus is that abortion is acceptable provided the foetuses is below a certain age. Deciding what that ages is complicated. So abortion per se according to the vast majority of people is not evil or bad. It is a natural extension of humankind's carelessness in having a child that they don't want.

I agree with the Pope in one respect in that in a more ideal and better world there would be no need for abortion because people would be far more careful and there would be no unwanted babies. But we have to accommodate humankind's sloppiness and bad behaviour. Abortion is a very bad compromise accommodating humankind's poor behaviour but it has to be acceptable because you have to respect women's rights as well. And the welfare of a child brought into this grim world when unwanted.

As I said, Pope Francis has got this wrong. And as I also say it's obvious who the better person is. And for the Pope to even suggest that Kamala Harris is evil is ridiculous. You might say that about Donald Trump! But it depends upon your political affiliations.

Some people worship Donald Trump. There's a kind of cult worship for him which is disconcerting. But neither person is evil really. But neither person is perfect. It's just that Kamala Harris is in a different league in terms of decent behaviour.

-----------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

According to Ian Murray, a Scottish Labour politician, Larry the Cat is a "little shit"

NEW AND VIEWS: Ian Murray is a Scottish Labour politician who has represented the Edinburgh South constituency in the UK Parliament since 2010. He grew up in Edinburgh and is a football fan. He is an advocate for Unionism and he dislikes Brexit. He's a centrist and a resilient and experienced politician.

Larry the Cat photographed at Downing Street outside No 10. Don't know who the photographer is. Sorry. Please tell me in a comment.

After the recent landslide Labour Party victory in the general election, he went to Downing Street after the office called the Scottish Labour Party politicians to get them down to number 10 as I understand it.

In a speech at the annual dinner of CBI Scotland in Glasgow he said the following about that visit:

"We were initially like kids in a sweet shop. Because the first thing we all did, we had the election, we had the overnight counts, the 37 Scottish Labour MPs got their photographs taken in Glasgow, we darted to the airport, we got to London, just made it to London in time. Downing Street rang, and all of us who pretty much knew inevitably that the Cabinet was going to be as the shadow cabinet was with a few exceptions, walked to Downing Street really excited and all we wanted to do was, not get the chat with the Prime Minister to be appointed [Sir Kier Starmer] but was to try and get a picture with Larry the cat."
He continued:

"And without putting too fine a point on it, Larry the Cat was a little shit. So none of us got a picture with Larry the Cat. Larry the Cat is the most miserable animal you'll ever meet in your life. I'm not surprised given who he's had to live with for the last 10 years."

Of course, he was making a funny speech or trying to be funny! So we have to forgive his criticism of Larry the Cat. But clearly the criticism is incorrect because why should Larry the Cat want to cooperate with the demands of a bunch of politicians who charge into number 10 Downing Street looking for a photograph. Many cats don't even like being photographed never mind with strangers.

Ian Murray. Image by Lauren Hurley / No 10 Downing Street - Number 10 Flickr page, OGL 3, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=150064834


He should have realised that domestic cats in general don't like the presence of entire strangers on their territory. And let's be clear, number 10 Downing Street is the territory of Larry the Cat. It is his home range including the environs. He's not going to cooperate. He no doubt scarpered and disappeared as soon as possible.

Without wishing to be too serious because this is a funny story (really), I think Ian Murray should do a little bit of judicious studying about cat behaviour at which point he wouldn't be so critical of our beloved Downing Street mouser.

--------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Donald Trump's Truth Social website publishes funny cat pics which are NOT funny

OPINION: This is a cross-post. In the other post [link] I explained that Donald Trump, in my view, is trying to defuse his near-fatal faux pas when he dived into making strong and unpleasant allegations about Haitian migrants in Springfield Ohio eating ducks, pet cats and pet dogs. He did this on mainstream television during the debate with Kamala Harris. He is a poor decision-maker and he knows he's made a big mistake and has been trying to roll back from that faux pas ever since to recover some losses to his campaign.

Donald Trump's Truth Social website publishes funny cat pics which are not funny
Image: DALLE as commissioned by Truth Social workers.

And with this goal in mind, he has, in my view, published some funny cat pictures which are decidedly unfunny on his Truth Social website, which, as you may know, is a substitute to X/Twitter from which he was banned at one time but he has now been reinstated by Elon Musk.

Donald Trump's Truth Social website publishes funny cat pics which are NOT funny
Image: DALLE as commissioned by Truth Social workers. This unfunny cat pic is a reference to Trump's allegation that he is strong on immigration while Harris is weak. And that migrants eat pet cats! Really, Trump is far to extreme and he is destabilising.

The pictures are, as you might imagine, generated by AI which cannot spell properly and often rights gobbledygook. But in the first picture it is claimed that Kamala Harris hates cats. It's actually the complete opposite. She has a very long and impressive track record both personally and professionally as a politician of supporting animal welfare both in respect of domestic and wild animals.

You can read about some of her actions by clicking on this link. In contrast, Donald Trump has a sketchy or arguably a very poor record of animal welfare. He has undermined conservation efforts in America regarding wolves and bears for example. He never had a companion animal in the White House which is the first instance for a hundred years.

His sons like to sport hunt Africa. Although to be fair Donald Trump doesn't like trophy hunting. But he did nothing about it when president. In fact he undermined the conservation and protection of iconic animals in Africa because she allowed the importation of trophies into America.

I have written many articles about Trump's failures in animal welfare. Click here to see the articles.

It's quite clear to me and I suspect to others that Donald Trump is not really interested in animal welfare. He is far more interested in making money and he's good with the economy which is important but the American economy should be expanded while respecting animal welfare in terms of wild animal conservation and protections for domestic animals. You can achieve both at the same time but Donald Trump likes to ride roughshod over the landscape, nature, and while animal welfare in driving economic growth.

Kamala Harris has demonstrated the complete opposite it seems to me. She is a tender-hearted woman and has been described as an animal champion. Trump supporters would probably argue that she is not strong on immigration or the economy but I think you have to give her a chance to demonstrate her strengths in these areas.

If you are to deal with illegal immigration in America humanely it becomes very difficult to deal with illegal immigration! The same problems exist in the UK and in continental Europe, specifically Germany. It's a very difficult problem, dealing with illegal immigration but you have to deal with it humanely.

Trump does not really want to deal with it humanely. I think we have to ask ourselves whether we would do the same thing as illegal immigrants if we were in their position. I certainly would. I would look for a better life. And if you can make it work by simply walking into America then you do it. It's one world. We are all in it together.

To return to the pictures. The picture of the ginger tabby holding up the Kamala Harris placard is misleading. It's entirely misleading. It's a lie! But then, Donald Trump is very good at lying isn't he?

-----------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Friday 13 September 2024

Many extreme claims of human longevity are likely due to errors or deliberate fraud


-------------------

The news media regularly report on the oldest woman or man. Many live in Japan. How do they achieve such long lifespans? Here is a theory:

Saul Justin Newman's theory on record-breaking longevity suggests that extreme claims of human longevity, particularly in areas without robust civil registration systems, might be inflated due to fraud or errors in age reporting. Newman argues that some of the longest-lived individuals, particularly supercentenarians (people over 110 years old), might not actually be as old as reported. Here's a breakdown of his argument:

1. Lack of Reliable Documentation

Newman points out that many of the regions reporting the longest-lived people, such as rural or economically underdeveloped areas, often lack reliable birth documentation like birth certificates. In these places, age records are frequently based on verbal reports or family accounts, which can be imprecise or exaggerated. Without a birth certificate, it becomes much harder to verify the actual age of an individual.

2. Error and Fraud in Age Reporting

  • Errors: In some cases, age might be overestimated due to innocent mistakes. People might not remember or know their exact birth date and may rely on rough estimates. These errors can compound over time and lead to exaggerated ages, especially in regions where age verification is not a priority or where official documentation is scarce.
  • Fraud: Newman also highlights the possibility of intentional fraud. In certain cases, people may intentionally exaggerate their age for various benefits, such as pensions, government support, or simply for social recognition and status. In areas where record-keeping is lax, it is easier for individuals to make such claims without being scrutinized.

3. Geographical Patterns in Longevity

Newman observes that many of the world's so-called longevity hotspots, like parts of the Caucasus, Okinawa, and Sardinia, report an unusually high number of centenarians and supercentenarians. However, these areas often have a history of poor birth registration systems or inaccurate civil records, which may inflate the actual number of extremely old individuals.

4. Statistical Models

Newman uses statistical models to suggest that extreme longevity claims are more likely to occur in populations with poor age reporting. According to his research, the distribution of reported supercentenarians is inconsistent with what would be expected if their ages were accurate. This statistical anomaly supports his hypothesis that errors or fraudulent claims are skewing the data.

5. Implications for Longevity Research

Newman's theory challenges the authenticity of the oldest age records, which has significant implications for the study of aging and human longevity. If these claims are unreliable, then the true limits of human lifespan might be lower than what is currently accepted. Moreover, it may also affect research into the biological factors contributing to extreme longevity, as studies based on inaccurate data might yield misleading conclusions.

In summary, Newman’s theory argues that many extreme claims of human longevity, especially in regions with poor documentation, are likely due to age-reporting errors or deliberate fraud rather than genuine biological outliers. This casts doubt on some of the most famous cases of extreme old age and calls for more rigorous verification of longevity records.

--------------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Kamala Harris accused of wearing earpiece earrings during presidential debate

It seems that the Donald Trump Cult followers have hatched a new conspiracy theory which as planned has gone viral on social media the purpose of which is to claw back some credibility for their leader after his disastrous performance during the debate as he ranted on about migrants in Ohio eating domestic cats without reasonable evidence. 

It all seems so bizarre to me. All of it. Including this latest conspiracy which has been covered by the English version of France 24.

Their video assesses this conspiracy theory and concludes that it is FAKE. As I have said things seems to descend into chaos when Trump is around. 

Here is the story in a video:


---------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Thursday 12 September 2024

Taylor Swift signs off "Childless Cat Lady" on Instagram post supporting Kamala Harris

Taylor Swift is the world's most musically talented and influential 'cat lady' even if she adopted the wrong cat - a Scottish Fold ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ˜’. It seems that the almost the whole of the USA is following her on Instagram. The US population is 336 million at present and she has 284 million followers. She has the power to make a difference in this election.

Taylor Swift and Benjamin Button a Ragdoll cat. Photo Taylor Swift.

Taylor Swift has said that she supports Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the presidential election. She signs off her post as a "Childless Cat Lady" in taking the Mickey out of J.D. Vance who as you may remember criticised childless cat ladies as people who were unhappy because they did not have a family. He both denigrated independent-minded women and the domestic cat at the same time. His comment attracted an avalanche of criticism which damaged Trump's presidential campaign. He tried unsuccessfully to backtrack.

And Taylor Swift said, as you can see in the post below, that she has to be transparent about who she wants to support because AI is a danger to the Internet (and of course it can be a great benefit - it depends how you use it). She says that an AI bot appears to have adopted her persona and made a post on her Instagram site saying that she endorsed Donald Trump; clearly very false and damaging information.

So in the vein of being transparent and open, she has clearly stated that she "will be casting my vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the 2024 Presidential Election".

She is voting for Kamala Harris, like many other people, because she champions the right sort of causes. She is a balanced individual. She's smart and decent and I say that she has a good face by which I mean that she has integrity which you can see in her general demeanour and her facial expressions.

And I've also stated that she is an animal champion. She champions animal welfare. This is the behaviour of a tender-hearted person in a world needs that kind of person.

Taylor Swift agrees with me that if Donald Trump becomes president there will be a certain amount of chaos. I have argue that if we have Putin plus Trump plus Xi Jinping in power at the same time we going to have chaos. We need someone to moderate things and focus on cooperation and compromise in order to stabilise the world. And I believe that Kamala Harris is that person.

And Taylor Swift says that she is very heartened by Walz's support of LGBTQ+ rights and IVF and "a woman's right to her own body". That's a reference I believe to abortion. The right to an abortion has been curtailed as I remember in certain states thanks to Trump's time as president.

Taylor Swift has done her research she says and she asks her followers to do theirs. She wants her followers to vote for Kamala Harris.


------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

German Foreign Office states in a tweet that they don't eat cats and dogs in Germany!

The German Foreign Office has dived into the viral online discussion about Donald Trump's screwup during the presidential debate with Kamala Harris in which he ranted and raved about Haitian migrants killing and eating pet cats and dogs in Ohio. 

His claims were based upon what appears to be anecdotal witness statements, perhaps from biased people who have an agenda against migrants. I don't know. But there were and currently are no hard facts that Haitian migrants eating cats and dogs in Ohio and therefore Trump was foolish to discuss that point in front of millions of Americans in a crucial debate.

I have argued that because of this he is not fit to be president because he is a poor decision-maker. He had plenty of time to decide what to debate and to behave professionally but he behaved like an amateur with a poor mind.


And above is a tweet from the German Foreign Office about renewable energy and about eating cats and dogs! The reference to renewable energy is because of Trump's attack on Harris's bid to move America towards a more diverse and sustainable mix of energy sources. Trump apparently said that Germany had tried and failed to give up fossil fuels.

Germany is counteracting that false Trump argument with this tweet. Just another example of the falsehoods disseminated by Donald Trump. He lacks integrity. We know that because of his cheating at golf. And he lies. He is misogynistic and he's a felon. And to that long list I've added his poor decision-making. A president must be an excellent decision-maker. There is no alternative. Trump fails.

Finally, I'm told that Germany supports Kamala Harris for the next president although they've not made a formal announcement.

---------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Pet owners could be fined £5,000 for burying beloved cat or dog in garden

UK: The title might look a bit worrying and I would argue it is slightly misleading because it was taken from an online newspaper's website ๐Ÿ˜Š. The truth is you can bury your pet cat in your back garden (backyard) if you own the property. But you can't bury your pet cat in the communal grounds of a block of flats or condominium because those grounds are owned by the freeholder or landlord and you would have to get their permission to do so.


The chance of being fined £5000 for burying your beloved cat or dog in the communal grounds of a block of flats is highly remote. Firstly, the landlord/freeholder would have to know that you've done it which is probably unlikely if you did it surreptitiously. And I'd doubt if the police would be interested! ๐Ÿ™„

But, then again, you wouldn't want to bury your beloved cat in communal grounds because you don't own those grounds and you don't want anybody walking over those grounds. The better choice would be to cremate using an individual cremation service by which I mean you cremate your cat individually to ensure that you receive the ashes of your cat and no other cat.

It would also be illegal in the UK to bury your pet in public places. It might be legal somewhere but most local councils have specific regulations and guidelines regarding the disposal of deceased pets. Public areas such as parks and streets are not permitted for pet burials due to health and safety concerns.

I suspect that these UK rules apply to other Western countries because they are common sense rules.

But it would be a good idea to check with your local council or environmental health department for specific regulations and guidelines in your area, in your country.

It is advised that the burial shouldn't be in contact with any water sources and be buried at least three feet deep in light soil to safeguard against scavengers. - Angela Slater, an expert at Hayes Garden World
--------------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Trump's POOR DECISION-MAKING evident in his rant about pet-eating migrants during presidential debate

Americans expect their next president to be able to make excellent decisions as and when necessary. It is the hallmark of a good president. It is their raison d'รชtre. An American president must be able to make great decisions. The best possible decisions, balancing up all the various factors and influences and consequences. I would expect that an American president makes hundreds of decisions every day all of which have the potential to improve for worsen the lives of Americans.

Trump's poor decision-making evident in his rant about pet-eating migrants during presidential debate
Screenshot from the debate. An angry as usual Trump and a smiling Harris.

The recent much-publicised debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris emphasises, as far as I am concerned, the fact that Donald Trump makes poor decisions. He is a poor decision-maker.

During this debate he had all the opportunity to discuss issues that are central to the lives of Americans such as healthcare and the economy. Immigration might also be in that discussion. Uncontrolled immigration is important to many Americans as it is too many other citizens of other countries including the UK.

Both parties to this debate had plenty of time to prepare for it. Donald Trump had the choice whether he should rant and rave about Haitian migrants eating pets in Springfield Ohio, or is it Canton Ohio, we don't know exactly? He could have avoided the subject completely. He could have addressed immigration but in a professional and balanced way.

But he went on - in his usual way - about a viral social media story which Springfield officials and police say is untrue. They say that there are no credible reports of pet-eating migrants. However, Ohio's Republican Attorney General has launched an investigation into the claims. Link to a further discussion on this.

And there's a video on social media of a Haitian woman, Allexis Telia Ferrell, being arrested and reportedly charged by the local police.

The police officer - as they approach the woman - receives a witness account from people standing by saying that she ate a cat. Were these witnesses truthful or did they have an agenda to further? And I'm told that she was charged - I guess on the basis of that witness evidence - but we are getting very mixed reports on this topic.

The point I'm making is this: at the moment there is no hard evidence that Haitian immigrants are killing and eating pet dogs and pet cats in Springfield or Canton, Ohio, USA. There appears to be some witness evidence but it's been hyped up on social media. It might be unreliable and biased.

And it appears to be hyped up on social media in order to further Donald Trump's political campaign about uncontrolled immigration into the country. He is very strong on that and it appears to be one of his major platforms for history election.

But you cannot, as a potential president of this great country, rant and rave about something on mainstream television in a very major debate that is not based on hard fact at the time you talk about it. 

In the heated exchange, Harris turned to Trump and declared that as vice president she had spoken to foreign leaders who "say you (Trump) are a disgrace."

He has egg on his face. He looks stupid. I am embarrassed for him. A really good person with a good mind would not do this. It's incredibly careless and stupid. It makes him look stupid. And it makes him look like a poor decision-maker. And unfit to be the next president.

I'm pleased because I am very much a supporter of Kamala Harris and I don't think that Donald Trump was a good president. I've said before that if you combine Putin with Xi Jinping you will get a kind of semi-chaos.

Trump's sidekick also fell into the same trap:

“Months ago, I raised the issue of Haitian illegal immigrants draining social services and generally causing chaos all over Springfield, Ohio,” JD Vance wrote on X/Twitter. “Reports now show that people have had their pets abducted and eaten by people who shouldn’t be in this country.”

------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Wednesday 11 September 2024

The most obvious inherited health issues of the Peke-face Persian: BAS.

Although the Peke-face Persian (flat-faced Persian) can suffer from all or one of 16 inherited diseases, the one highlighted in the infographic below is the most obvious. It is perhaps the classic consequence of breeding cats with unnaturally shaped heads and faces to try and meet an aesthetic which pleases the eye of some. Heavens knows why because the Peke-face is certainly uglier than the Doll-face.

There is no cure for this or the other Peke-face Persian inherited diseases because they are caused by a distorted face and head due to extreme breeding. You have to change the breeding practices over a long time if you are to 'cure' this shameful state of affairs where the cat fancy have abdicated their responsibilities to ensure that they breed healthy cats. In fact I think you'll see that the CFA demands in their breed standards that health should not be compromised BUT IT IS (in the most gross way)! And has been for decades in really serious ways causing distress and unhappiness in these cats. 

If you click on this link: Infographics on Peke-face Persian health problems, you'll see some more health issues associated with this breed, if that interests you. Each one is a 60 second read. The goal is to explain sometimes complicated medical information in studies in an infographic. I want everyone to have access to this kind of information as it is good for cat welfare and to educate potential adopters of purebred cats.


------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

US halts plan to remove iconic stray cats from a historic area in Puerto Rico's capital

Alley Cat Allies, an advocacy organization for the humane treatment of cats, has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. National Park Service (NPS) to halt the removal of community cats from the historic district of Old San Juan, Puerto Rico. The NPS had proposed removing an estimated 200 cats from the area surrounding the Paseo del Morro, a seaside fortress in San Juan, citing concerns over sanitation and the impact of the cats on the site. The plan, which could involve lethal measures, has sparked strong opposition from animal advocates and locals who see the cats as part of the area's cultural identity.

US halts plan to remove iconic stray cats from a historic area in Puerto Rico's capital
US halts plan to remove iconic stray cats from a historic area in Puerto Rico's capital. Image: DALLE.

Alley Cat Allies argues that the NPS's plan violates the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other legal protections, insisting that the longstanding Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) program, which controls the cat population humanely, is a more effective solution. The organization has also sought a temporary restraining order to stop the removal, citing the likelihood of new cats moving in if the current population is eliminated (known as the "Vacuum Effect"). They emphasize that killing the cats would be not only cruel but also futile.

“It’s a victory for the short term, but long term, these cats are still at risk,” said Yonaton Aronoff, an attorney for Maryland-based Alley Cat Allies. Aronoff said in a phone interview that removing the current cats is an impossible task since new cats would take their place.

“They’re going to have to keep doing this forever,” he said. This legal battle highlights broader debates about wildlife management, community values, and humane treatment of animals.

Puerto Rico is under U.S. jurisdiction. It is an unincorporated U.S. territory, which means that while it is part of the United States, it does not have the full rights of a U.S. state. Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens, but the island has limited representation in Congress, and residents cannot vote in U.S. presidential elections. The U.S. federal government, including agencies like the National Park Service (NPS), has authority over certain aspects of governance and legal matters on the island.

Sources: Alley Cat Allies and Associated Press.

--------------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Tuesday 10 September 2024

Sabalenka’s forehand said to be faster that Alcaraz's but women use different balls


Tennis coaching guru Patrick Mouratoglou claimed on LinkedIn that based on Aryna Sabalenka’s performance at the recent US Open Tennis Championships her forehand is faster than that of both Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner. 
“Aryna Sabalenka’s average forehand speed during this US Open is faster than that of top men’s players,” said Mouratoglous.
It is in the news but he forgot one crucial difference in the equipment used. Here it is:

In professional tennis, both men and women use the same standard tennis balls in most major tournaments. However, there is one notable exception:

In the U.S. Open, women play with a slightly different ball than the men. Women use the regular-duty tennis ball, which has a thinner felt coating, while men use the extra-duty tennis ball, which has a thicker felt. Both balls have the same weight and size, but the thinner felt on the regular-duty ball makes it move faster through the air, providing slightly different playing characteristics. 

Outside of the U.S. Open, both men and women typically use the same type of extra-duty ball in most other tournaments, such as the Australian Open, French Open, and Wimbledon.

Sorry, but the ''expert' appears to have made a fatal mistake in his argument. 

I suspect, actually, that the women play with different balls in more tournaments than is publicised but it is kept quiet. I am happy for them to play with balls that travel faster as it makes their game more interesting.

Research indicates that in the other three Grand Slams—Australian Open, French Open, and Wimbledon—men and women use the same type of tennis balls. This difference at the US Open has been a point of discussion among players, with some female players, such as Iga ลšwiฤ…tek, advocating for the use of the same balls for both men and women.

-------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Monday 9 September 2024

Video of woman being arrested in a public place for eating someone's cat

Video of woman being arrested outside for eating someone's cat

Here is the video on X. It is weird and painful to realise that this woman allegedly ate a domestic cat and apparently there are witnesses so it seems she ate the cat in a public place. Dare I ask: "Did she kill and cook the cat, or did she just kill the cat and eat it raw?"

Makes me puke to think about it. But is it true? Remarkably it seems that there is a claim from Republicans that Haitian migrants in Springfield, OH are killing and eating pets. This arrest might be linked to that story. These claims are it seems politically motivated to boost Trump's campaign because he is very much against immigrants. The woman above is I believe Allexis Telia Ferrell and the place is Canton, OH, about 200 miles from Springfield.

I have just written about Trump's incredibly poor decision-making to rant and rave about this viral social media story in the presidential debate when it is not based on hard fact [link to follow-up article]. A terrible decision by him and he has egg on his face.
On Monday, social media was flooded with posts from prominent conservative lawmakers and commentators claiming Haitian migrants in the town of Springfield, Ohio, were brutalizing and consuming local cats and ducks. - Rolling Stone

If she did eat a cat she must have been high on drugs surely. No other way a person could do that unless they were mentally ill. Days later the information is that this is 'fake' news but the picture is not clear.

The police officer wanted the Humane Society to take the deceased cat away. A bit odd that. Surely the cat should have been kept as evidence and after a trial cremated. It looks like the police had no intention of charging the woman and taking the matter to trial. Perhaps the police don't believe the witnesses. Perhaps this supports the claims that this is all bogus political shenanigans.

Linked article: Haitians killing and eating pet cats in Ohio? True or false? This is an evolving and therefore somewhat fragmented story.

This is a quote from The Mirror:

During his first debate with Kamala Harris, former President Trump told the millions of viewers: "They're eating the dogs, the people that came in. They're eating the cats, they're eating the pets of the people that live there. And this is what is happening in this country and it is a shame."

On the issue as to whether the allegation that Haitian migrants are killing and eating pet dogs and cats, Viles Dorsainvil, president of Springfield's Haitian Community Help and Support Center, told NBC News: "It's just bigotry, discrimination and racism. There is a group of people who have been fabricating some news just to denigrate Haitians."

JD Vance has admitted that "It's possible, of course, that all of these rumours will turn out to be false."

Although Trump insisted that they were true and as mentioned on this page, the Springfield city manager's statement that "there have been no credible reports or specific claims of pets being harmed, injured, or abused by individuals within the immigrant community," means that it's unlikely that the claims are true. And as mentioned also on this page I have hinted before that there appears to be an agenda here based on racism. Although a proper investigation would help.

-----------------
P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Laughter can speed up recovery from illness. Study of sick kids in an Israeli hospital.

Being an old man, I am always interested in ways to improve one's well-being and overall health. It's important in many respects. In fact it should be a vital objective of all people. We should all be concerned with it and that includes people who care for a domestic cat companion. If a cat owner is ill it's unlikely they'll be able to discharge their cat caring duties fully. It affects the cat negatively. We create the cat's environment in all senses. I am not saying that being happy is easy becomes sometimes it is not!

Laughter can speed up recovery from illness as shown in this study of sick kids in hospital
Clown entertains sick child at hospital which speeds up recovery

With this in mind, it's a known fact that laughter can speed up recovery from illness. A recent study supports the findings of other studies and real-life experiences. In this instance it concerned children patients at hospital. They were seriously ill with pneumonia.

The researchers used a team of specially trained medical clowns with painted faces and the skill to entertain. They found that when they entertained the patients they cut the time they needed to be on intravenous antibiotics.

The researchers followed 51 children aged between 2 and 18 who had been admitted to hospital with pneumonia at the Carmel Medical Centre in Israel.

One group received standard care while the other received the same care plus a 15 minute session with a medical clown twice a day in the first 48 hours after admission to hospital.

The researchers employed three medical clowns from The Dream Doctors Project who use various techniques to relax patients. They employed music, singing and 'guided imagination'. They encouraged the children to drink and eat by themselves again.

The researchers discovered that the group who were visited by a medical clown had an average stay in hospital of 43.5 hours compared with 70 hours for the children who were not visited by the clowns.

Also, the children visited by medical clowns needed only two days of intravenous biotics compared with the usual three days for the control group.

The lead author of the study is Dr. Karin Yaacoby-Bianu. The findings were presented at the European Respiratory Society Congress in Vienna.

Looking wider, laughter is indeed a contributor to speeding up recovery from illness. It cannot be a cure on its own normally but other scientific studies have suggested that laughter because several positive effects on health and well-being.

For example:
  • It boosts the immune system. It's been shown to increase the production of antibodies and activate T-cells which are essential for a healthy immune response.
  • Laughter lowers the levels of stress hormones such as cortisol. These can weaken the immune system and slowdown recovery.
  • Laughter triggers the release of endorphins. These are the body's natural painkillers which make it easier to manage pain and discomfort.
  • And further, laughter improves blood flow and cardiovascular function. These are essential for recovery and overall health.
  • And finally, laughter can alleviate stress and depression thereby improving mental health which can be common during illness. A positive mental state can promote faster healing.

Laughter isn't a replacement for medical treatment but it can complemented and enhance recovery.

-------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Sunday 8 September 2024

America's top 2 cat associations should be ashamed of the Peke-face Persian

Here is another infographic about the health problems associated with the Peke-face Persian which is bred to extreme to create an entirely unnatural facial appearance which leads to many serious health problems. More to follow! Here are three concerning the mouth, coat and eyes. I am on the attack against cat associations which refuse to amend their breed standards to prioritise health in breeds.

When these cat associations - The International Cat Association (TICA) and the Cat Fanciers' Association (CFA) insist on certain anatomical features such as a sheer, flat face and a super-long hair you get the kind of health problem referred to in the infographic.

It is just not right that these cat associations have been encouraging and supporting breeders to create these unhealthy cats through their breed standards which, in Germany, would be called 'torture breeding' and banned.

There are other breeds that are inherently unhealthy and which should not exist such as the breed made popular by Taylor Swift who is incredibly influential; the Scottish Fold. She should be ashamed too. She is looked up to but she has her flaws, one of which is promoting an unhealthy breed that is also banned in Germany. The breed should not exist.


Below is a picture of a champion Peke-face Persian cat on TICA's website. Behind that image there is pain and distress in many ultra-Persian cats. It is a false representation of the state of this breed. It is a con basically.
 
America's top 2 cat associations should be ashamed of the Peke-face Persian
7th Best Kitten Of The Year IW BW Dark Diamond’s Sebastian/CF. Image credit as stated in the photo.

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

FULL ASSESSMENT showing that electric vehicles are better than petrol vehicles for the environment

Here is a FULL ASSESSMENT showing that electric vehicles are better than petrol vehicles for the environment. The environmental impact of electric vehicles (EVs) versus petrol vehicles (internal combustion engine vehicles, or ICEs) has been a subject of extensive analysis. To fully assess whether EVs are better for the environment, several factors need to be examined, including emissions during use, manufacturing processes, battery production, energy sources, and lifecycle environmental impact.

1. Emissions During Operation

  • EVs:
    • EVs have zero tailpipe emissions. They do not emit carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), or particulate matter during use, which is a key environmental benefit.
    • However, the electricity used to charge EVs can vary in its environmental impact, depending on the energy mix of the grid. In regions where electricity comes primarily from renewable sources (solar, wind, hydro), the emissions during charging are minimal. But in areas where coal or other fossil fuels dominate the energy mix, the charging process does contribute to CO2 emissions.
  • Petrol Vehicles:
    • Petrol vehicles emit significant CO2 and other harmful gases during use. For example, a typical gasoline car emits about 4.6 metric tons of CO2 per year, depending on fuel efficiency. This includes NOx and particulate matter, which contribute to air pollution and human health issues.

Key Takeaway: EVs have a clear advantage in terms of emissions during use, especially in regions with cleaner electricity grids. Even in areas with a fossil fuel-heavy energy mix, EVs often result in lower emissions due to the higher efficiency of electric motors compared to internal combustion engines.

2. Manufacturing and Battery Production

  • EVs:
    • EV manufacturing, particularly battery production, is energy-intensive. Studies show that producing an EV, especially its lithium-ion battery, can result in higher emissions than manufacturing a petrol car.
    • For instance, manufacturing an EV battery can emit between 50-75% more CO2 than producing a gasoline car. This is due to the mining and processing of raw materials like lithium, cobalt, and nickel, which are used in batteries.
  • Petrol Vehicles:
    • Manufacturing petrol vehicles also requires substantial energy, but their engines are generally less complex to produce compared to EV batteries. As a result, initial manufacturing emissions are lower.
  • Improvement in Battery Technology:
    • The environmental cost of battery production is decreasing as technologies improve and cleaner energy is used in manufacturing processes. Recycling initiatives are also being developed to reuse materials from old batteries, reducing the need for raw material extraction.
    • For example, second-life applications for EV batteries in energy storage systems are gaining popularity.

Key Takeaway: While EV manufacturing, particularly battery production, has higher emissions upfront, these are often offset over the vehicle's lifetime through reduced operational emissions. As battery technology improves and recycling grows, this gap is expected to narrow further.

3. Energy Source for Charging

  • The environmental advantage of EVs depends largely on the energy mix used to generate electricity.
  • Regions with Cleaner Grids:
    • In countries like Norway, where the majority of electricity comes from hydropower, EVs have almost no associated CO2 emissions during operation.
  • Regions with Fossil Fuel Grids:
    • In places where coal or natural gas is dominant (e.g., parts of China and India), the advantage of EVs is reduced, although they still tend to have lower emissions over their lifetime compared to petrol vehicles.
  • Global Trends:
    • As more countries transition to renewable energy sources (solar, wind, hydro), the carbon footprint of charging EVs will decrease. Governments are also offering incentives to speed up this energy transition, which directly benefits the sustainability of EVs.

Key Takeaway: The environmental performance of EVs improves dramatically as the electricity grid becomes greener. In the long term, with global moves toward renewable energy, EVs are positioned to become even more environmentally friendly.

4. Lifecycle Analysis (LCA)

A full lifecycle analysis includes emissions from the extraction of raw materials, vehicle production, vehicle use, and end-of-life disposal.

  • EVs:
    • Several studies show that, over their entire lifecycle, EVs tend to have lower total CO2 emissions compared to petrol vehicles. A study by the European Environment Agency (EEA) found that, even considering battery production, an EV emits about 17-30% less CO2 over its entire lifecycle than a comparable petrol vehicle.
    • As battery recycling and production processes improve, this figure is expected to increase.
  • Petrol Vehicles:
    • Petrol vehicles have lower manufacturing emissions but much higher operational emissions. Over a vehicle’s typical lifespan, these higher emissions outweigh the manufacturing benefits.

Key Takeaway: EVs have a lower overall environmental impact over their lifecycle compared to petrol vehicles, especially as grid energy mixes become cleaner and battery recycling advances.

5. Resource Extraction and Environmental Impact

  • EV Batteries:
    • The extraction of lithium, cobalt, and nickel for EV batteries has significant environmental and social implications. Mining activities can lead to habitat destruction, water use, and pollution. Moreover, cobalt mining in particular has been associated with unethical labor practices.
    • However, there are efforts to develop alternatives to these materials, such as solid-state batteries, and to improve mining practices to reduce their environmental and social costs.
  • Oil Extraction:
    • The extraction, refining, and transportation of oil for petrol vehicles also has severe environmental impacts, including oil spills, habitat destruction, and significant emissions during refining and transportation.

Key Takeaway: Both EVs and petrol vehicles are associated with environmental harm related to resource extraction. However, innovations in battery recycling and a move towards sustainable mining practices are improving the environmental impact of EVs, whereas oil extraction remains environmentally damaging.

6. Recycling and End-of-Life Disposal

  • EVs:
    • EV battery recycling is still in its early stages, but progress is being made. Companies like Tesla and Redwood Materials are developing processes to recover valuable materials from old batteries, which can be reused in new ones.
    • This is crucial for reducing the need for new raw material extraction.
  • Petrol Vehicles:
    • Petrol vehicles also have recyclable parts, but end-of-life disposal often results in waste, especially for non-metallic components like plastics.

Key Takeaway: EV recycling is improving and has significant potential to reduce the environmental impact of battery production, while recycling of petrol vehicles is more established but doesn’t address the fundamental emissions problem.


Conclusion

Based on the full assessment of available statistics and facts, electric vehicles are better for the environment than petrol vehicles, especially in regions with cleaner electricity grids. Key points include:

  1. Lower operational emissions: EVs produce no tailpipe emissions and generally have lower lifetime CO2 emissions, even when accounting for electricity generation and battery production.
  2. Lifecycle advantages: Despite the higher emissions from manufacturing, particularly related to battery production, EVs offer lower overall emissions over their lifespan due to zero emissions during operation and the shift towards renewable energy.
  3. Battery technology advancements: Improvements in battery efficiency, production, and recycling are expected to make EVs even more environmentally friendly in the future.
  4. Energy grid decarbonization: As more electricity grids shift to renewable energy sources, the environmental benefits of EVs will increase further.

While there are challenges related to raw material extraction and initial manufacturing, these are being mitigated by ongoing improvements in technology, making EVs a more sustainable long-term solution compared to petrol vehicles.

Source: ChatGPT. This AI bot has been programmed with tons of information from the internet which is an issue for website owners but it does mean that the information is pretty reliable notwithstanding that this is a complicated topic.

Featured Post

i hate cats

i hate cats, no i hate f**k**g cats is what some people say when they dislike cats. But they nearly always don't explain why. It appe...

Popular posts