Short Legs of Dwarf Cats

The short legs of dwarf cats are thought to be due to pseudoachondroplasia a type of short-limb dwarfism. It affect people as well. The prefix “pseudo” is used as the affects of this genetic mutation is not the same as achondroplasia dwarfism. The difference (as I mention on the dwarf cat health issues page) is that while pseudoachondroplasia is characterised by short limbs and a normal head, achondroplastic dwarfism is characterised by short legs and an enlarged head.

I don’t know how settled the assessment of the genetic mutation is dwarf cats is. But I do know that recent research has uncovered the cause of the canine equivalent of the dwarf cat, the dachshund.

Research indicates that the short legs of the dachshund (a dog with a normal body and head like dwarf cats and short legs) are due to the mutation, thousands of years ago, of a single gene.

The American National Human Genome Research Institute discovered that all short-legged purebred dogs carried an extra copy of a gene that codes for a “growth-promoting protein called fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF4)”. This gene is thought to be, “a retrogene that was inserted into the dog genome some time after the ancestor of modern dog breeds diverged from wolves.”

Its presence results in the overproduction of the FGF4 protein, which is believed to switch on growth receptors at the wrong time during foetal development. This in turn causes the legs to be short and out of proportion.

The question I have is whether this research has any bearing on the creation of the short legs of dwarf cats? Answers would be welcome and can be submitted, please, on a form at the base of the Dwarf Cats and Miniature Cats page.

From the Short Legs of Dwarf Cats to Dwarf Cats and Miniature Cats

Comments

  1. For me a more useful question would be - why do we need to deliberately breed a cat (or any animal) with dwarfism?

    Breeding for form over function is always a mistake and will result in an ever growing incidence of crippling deformity and disease. So many breeds of cat already suffer the consequences - the Rex cats, Norwegian Forest, Maine Coons, Persians... the list is long.

    Would it not be better to promote breeding for health and function over form? I see no benefit to the species of domestic cat in producing versions which will inevitably throw up animals which will suffer from appalling defects.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are absolutely correct. Thanks for taking the time to comment.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't know if you have seen the FAB page on Inherited Disorders, but there is a small paragraph on the Munchkin which could hint that there is some serious reserach happening into feline dwarfism!

    http://www.fabcats.org/breeders/inherited_disorders/index.php

    It's frightening just how many breeds have HCM.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for this. And yes, I agree, HCM is bad. The Bengal breeders (amongst a number of cat breeds) thought they had a "healthy" cat until HCM turned up. I wouldn't adopt a Bengal cat without a full medical and family medical history an even that wouldn't be enough.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Your comments are always welcome.

Popular Posts