Showing posts with label electric vehicles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label electric vehicles. Show all posts

Sunday 8 September 2024

FULL ASSESSMENT showing that electric vehicles are better than petrol vehicles for the environment

Here is a FULL ASSESSMENT showing that electric vehicles are better than petrol vehicles for the environment. The environmental impact of electric vehicles (EVs) versus petrol vehicles (internal combustion engine vehicles, or ICEs) has been a subject of extensive analysis. To fully assess whether EVs are better for the environment, several factors need to be examined, including emissions during use, manufacturing processes, battery production, energy sources, and lifecycle environmental impact.

1. Emissions During Operation

  • EVs:
    • EVs have zero tailpipe emissions. They do not emit carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), or particulate matter during use, which is a key environmental benefit.
    • However, the electricity used to charge EVs can vary in its environmental impact, depending on the energy mix of the grid. In regions where electricity comes primarily from renewable sources (solar, wind, hydro), the emissions during charging are minimal. But in areas where coal or other fossil fuels dominate the energy mix, the charging process does contribute to CO2 emissions.
  • Petrol Vehicles:
    • Petrol vehicles emit significant CO2 and other harmful gases during use. For example, a typical gasoline car emits about 4.6 metric tons of CO2 per year, depending on fuel efficiency. This includes NOx and particulate matter, which contribute to air pollution and human health issues.

Key Takeaway: EVs have a clear advantage in terms of emissions during use, especially in regions with cleaner electricity grids. Even in areas with a fossil fuel-heavy energy mix, EVs often result in lower emissions due to the higher efficiency of electric motors compared to internal combustion engines.

2. Manufacturing and Battery Production

  • EVs:
    • EV manufacturing, particularly battery production, is energy-intensive. Studies show that producing an EV, especially its lithium-ion battery, can result in higher emissions than manufacturing a petrol car.
    • For instance, manufacturing an EV battery can emit between 50-75% more CO2 than producing a gasoline car. This is due to the mining and processing of raw materials like lithium, cobalt, and nickel, which are used in batteries.
  • Petrol Vehicles:
    • Manufacturing petrol vehicles also requires substantial energy, but their engines are generally less complex to produce compared to EV batteries. As a result, initial manufacturing emissions are lower.
  • Improvement in Battery Technology:
    • The environmental cost of battery production is decreasing as technologies improve and cleaner energy is used in manufacturing processes. Recycling initiatives are also being developed to reuse materials from old batteries, reducing the need for raw material extraction.
    • For example, second-life applications for EV batteries in energy storage systems are gaining popularity.

Key Takeaway: While EV manufacturing, particularly battery production, has higher emissions upfront, these are often offset over the vehicle's lifetime through reduced operational emissions. As battery technology improves and recycling grows, this gap is expected to narrow further.

3. Energy Source for Charging

  • The environmental advantage of EVs depends largely on the energy mix used to generate electricity.
  • Regions with Cleaner Grids:
    • In countries like Norway, where the majority of electricity comes from hydropower, EVs have almost no associated CO2 emissions during operation.
  • Regions with Fossil Fuel Grids:
    • In places where coal or natural gas is dominant (e.g., parts of China and India), the advantage of EVs is reduced, although they still tend to have lower emissions over their lifetime compared to petrol vehicles.
  • Global Trends:
    • As more countries transition to renewable energy sources (solar, wind, hydro), the carbon footprint of charging EVs will decrease. Governments are also offering incentives to speed up this energy transition, which directly benefits the sustainability of EVs.

Key Takeaway: The environmental performance of EVs improves dramatically as the electricity grid becomes greener. In the long term, with global moves toward renewable energy, EVs are positioned to become even more environmentally friendly.

4. Lifecycle Analysis (LCA)

A full lifecycle analysis includes emissions from the extraction of raw materials, vehicle production, vehicle use, and end-of-life disposal.

  • EVs:
    • Several studies show that, over their entire lifecycle, EVs tend to have lower total CO2 emissions compared to petrol vehicles. A study by the European Environment Agency (EEA) found that, even considering battery production, an EV emits about 17-30% less CO2 over its entire lifecycle than a comparable petrol vehicle.
    • As battery recycling and production processes improve, this figure is expected to increase.
  • Petrol Vehicles:
    • Petrol vehicles have lower manufacturing emissions but much higher operational emissions. Over a vehicle’s typical lifespan, these higher emissions outweigh the manufacturing benefits.

Key Takeaway: EVs have a lower overall environmental impact over their lifecycle compared to petrol vehicles, especially as grid energy mixes become cleaner and battery recycling advances.

5. Resource Extraction and Environmental Impact

  • EV Batteries:
    • The extraction of lithium, cobalt, and nickel for EV batteries has significant environmental and social implications. Mining activities can lead to habitat destruction, water use, and pollution. Moreover, cobalt mining in particular has been associated with unethical labor practices.
    • However, there are efforts to develop alternatives to these materials, such as solid-state batteries, and to improve mining practices to reduce their environmental and social costs.
  • Oil Extraction:
    • The extraction, refining, and transportation of oil for petrol vehicles also has severe environmental impacts, including oil spills, habitat destruction, and significant emissions during refining and transportation.

Key Takeaway: Both EVs and petrol vehicles are associated with environmental harm related to resource extraction. However, innovations in battery recycling and a move towards sustainable mining practices are improving the environmental impact of EVs, whereas oil extraction remains environmentally damaging.

6. Recycling and End-of-Life Disposal

  • EVs:
    • EV battery recycling is still in its early stages, but progress is being made. Companies like Tesla and Redwood Materials are developing processes to recover valuable materials from old batteries, which can be reused in new ones.
    • This is crucial for reducing the need for new raw material extraction.
  • Petrol Vehicles:
    • Petrol vehicles also have recyclable parts, but end-of-life disposal often results in waste, especially for non-metallic components like plastics.

Key Takeaway: EV recycling is improving and has significant potential to reduce the environmental impact of battery production, while recycling of petrol vehicles is more established but doesn’t address the fundamental emissions problem.


Conclusion

Based on the full assessment of available statistics and facts, electric vehicles are better for the environment than petrol vehicles, especially in regions with cleaner electricity grids. Key points include:

  1. Lower operational emissions: EVs produce no tailpipe emissions and generally have lower lifetime CO2 emissions, even when accounting for electricity generation and battery production.
  2. Lifecycle advantages: Despite the higher emissions from manufacturing, particularly related to battery production, EVs offer lower overall emissions over their lifespan due to zero emissions during operation and the shift towards renewable energy.
  3. Battery technology advancements: Improvements in battery efficiency, production, and recycling are expected to make EVs even more environmentally friendly in the future.
  4. Energy grid decarbonization: As more electricity grids shift to renewable energy sources, the environmental benefits of EVs will increase further.

While there are challenges related to raw material extraction and initial manufacturing, these are being mitigated by ongoing improvements in technology, making EVs a more sustainable long-term solution compared to petrol vehicles.

Source: ChatGPT. This AI bot has been programmed with tons of information from the internet which is an issue for website owners but it does mean that the information is pretty reliable notwithstanding that this is a complicated topic.

Saturday 11 November 2023

Jamie Lynn Spears blames Tesla cars for killing her cats!

NEWS AND COMMENT: This is hardly a story worth repeating but it is interesting in a way that Britney Spears's sister won't want to read about. Her name is Jamie Lynn Spears and she has accused Tesla EV cars in particular of killing her cats. Note that it is in the plural and therefore more than one cat of hers has been killed by a Tesla car.

Jamie Lynn Spears is a cat owner and she lets then go outside where more than one has been hit by EVs. Image credit: see base of page.

She is basically blaming Elon Musk who I am sure is totally disinterested in this.

Jamie Lynn, 32, claims that her beloved pets (note once again that it's in the plural) are being killed by Teslas because the cats can't hear the cars coming.

Tough but realistic comment: if you've lost one cat in a road traffic accident concerning a Tesla car, I don't think you should let your other cat outside or you should take some steps to protect your cat. It appears to me that she lives on a road which is not quiet and where there is a possibility that an outdoor cat can be hit by a car. You take measures to stop that happening which doesn't seem to be the case for Jamie Lynn.

I have read similar stories about cat owners complaining about road traffic killing their cats. The solution is in the hands of the owner. Don't blame cars or roads. Don't try and deflect the blame as it all comes back to the owner.

She wrote on social media:
"We have now lost — I don’t want to tell you how many cats — because they don’t hear the Tesla crank and unfortunate things happen and it’s really devastating and tragic for everyone involved. Elon Musk, let’s figure this out. You owe me a couple cats.”
I don't think the problem is with the quietness of EVs but with allowing cats to walk onto the road. Personally, I don't have a problem with the quietness of electric vehicles. They do in fact make a sound. And you have the sound of the tyres on the road which can be quite pronounced. There's no question that you can hear an electric vehicle coming.

Despite that, I'm told that as of 2020 regulations in America mean that electric vehicles have to emit sounds louder than a certain decibel level which is about the level of a washing machine. I don't know if that's true and if it is I think it's silly because one advantage of an EV is that it is quiet. Why take that away with some artificial sound box tucked underneath the dashboard? I just don't get that at all.

The bigger issue on electric vehicles is that the insurance on them is rising rapidly to unsustainable levels because, the insurance companies argue, that repair of electric vehicles is very expensive because the batteries are very expensive to replace. The cost of repairing electric vehicles is pushing up insurance policies across the board but particularly for EVs.

This will curtail the purchase of electric vehicles which, indirectly, will help Jamie Lynn because they'll be more diesels and petrol-engined cars on the road pretty soon if this electric vehicle crisis continues.

On the upside it is nice to know that Jamie Lynn likes cats. Shame she is an irresponsible cat owner.

Image credit: By NickRewind - Jamie Lynn Spears Talks NEW Zoey 102 Movie ☀️ #Shorts NickRewind, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=136214583

-----------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins.

Featured Post

i hate cats

i hate cats, no i hate f**k**g cats is what some people say when they dislike cats. But they nearly always don't explain why. It appe...

Popular posts