Dachshunds and British Shorthairs the most popular dog and cat breeds in the UK 2026

There was a time during the Covid pandemic and I guess shortly afterwards when the French Bulldog was the most popular breed in the UK but owners of this dog breed learnt to their cost that the French Bulldog is perhaps the most unhealthy dog breed of all with, as I recall, an average lifespan of about seven years, which falls far short of the general average which must be somewhere around 13 years for dogs and perhaps about 18 years for cats nowadays.

So the French Bulldog is, today, in 2026, the third most popular breed having slipped from first place and that lofty position has been taken by the miniature dachshund.

I often visit Richmond Park to walk and the most common dog that I see is, unsurprisingly, thr dachshund both the standard version and the miniature version and some wirehaired versions.

It was apparent to me without reading this Times article that the dachshund in the UK is the most popular breed. And as mentioned it is the miniature version of the dachshund which is the popular one.

Popularity as usual has been driven in part by celebrity culture with celebrities showing off their dachshunds. Perhaps the best known celebrity to live with a dachshund is the singer Adele who named her dog after Louis Armstrong.

The rise in the miniature dachshund has been swift because in 2018 the breed was the 16th most popular offered for sale. In second place today is the Cocker Spaniel.

The survey comes from Pets4Homes which is the UK's largest online marketplace for pets. They say that the miniature dachshund accounts for 1/3 of the country's puppy sales. However, the dachshund also has health issues (back) and it can be bred to long and too low to the ground. They are dwarf animals which is morally problematic.

Prices are beginning to rise again with 2025 being a turning point in prices and therefore popularity. The average puppy price reached £989 in December 2025 which is up 23% year-on-year. Demand has recovered to above pre-pandemic levels.

There are far more pedigree dogs and there are pedigree cats. This is because the domestic dog has been in existence for far longer than the domestic cat. Dogs were domesticated perhaps 20,000 or more years ago while it is believed that the wildcat was first domesticated around 10,000 years ago but that date is in dispute to a certain extent.

The reason for the early domestication of dogs is because they were used as utilitarian animals whereas cats are much less able to be utilitarian.

Pedigree dogs account for 65% of puppies sold which by the way is down from 82% 10 years ago. Perhaps nowadays there are more people adopting rescue dogs which are mixed breed dogs. This would indicates a greater concern nowadays for dog welfare than in the past.

The survey also concluded that cats are gaining ground in popularity with kitten adverts rising 8% in 2025 which represents a second consecutive year of growth. As mentioned in the title, British Shorthair cats are the most popular breed. They have a dense coat and they are known to be very good full-time indoor cats with a placid temperament. I suspect that a lot of these cats are full-time indoor cats because of modern work practices and with people being more aware that there are natural dangers outside for free-roaming cats particularly road traffic.

The British shorthair represents about 20% of sales by the way.

The Cavalier King Charles spaniel is the most expensive dog with an average price of £1441. The average price of a miniature dachshund in the UK, in December 2025 was £1016. Note: I can remember dog prices being a lot higher during the Covid pandemic because of rapidly increased demand and a lack of supply.

Prices for the miniature dachshund have risen £33 over the period 2024 (December) to 2025.

People who are interested in animal welfare will be pleased that the French Bulldog has lost its some of its popularity. Animal rights activist would argue that the French Bulldog should not be bred at all because it is inherently unhealthy due to its extreme breeding with an extremely round head with a very flat face described as brachycephalic by experts. The reason why breeders do this is to make the dog look more like a baby child which triggers a desire to buy the animal.

A lot of people nowadays appear to be buying dogs as a precursor to having a baby. They are testing themselves to see whether they can cope and whether they enjoy the experience.

Accordingly, it is arguable that they are treating their dogs as little babies which is to anthropomorphise them, which in itself, is not entirely advisable although quite cute. That's because one should treat dogs as dogs in order to ensure that they are even the best chance to behave naturally.

------------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also, sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. And, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable. Finally, (!) I often express an OPINION on the news. Please share yours in a comment.

Rogue UK police on rise despite Sir Mark Rowley's promises

I clearly remember Sir Mark Rowley, the Met Police Commissioner, promising to root out rogue police officers when he got the top job (2022). And yet The Times reports, today 23rd January 2026, that the number of criminal charges against police officers in England and Wales has risen by an astonishing 42 per cent in the past year according to Home Office figures.

Officers faced 323 charges, including 85 for sexual assault in the year to March 2025 up from 227 in 2023-24 and 160 in 2022-23. Data showed 1,687 officers were referred to misconduct cases.

Ah, misconduct cases! I am embroiled in one of my making at the moment. I was pushed over aggressively while photographing a protest in London which resulted in the breakage of the neck of my left femur -  a very serious injury resulting in the death of 30% of sufferers in the first year believe it or not. The officer committed a crime against me (GBH or assault occasioning actual bodily harm) but on my formal complaint the Directorate of Police Standards (DPS) said that his behaviour was perfectly acceptable! 

Only they refuse to show me the body worn camera that was worn by the officer who assaulted me (PC Lockett). I am making an application for Judicial Review and have complained to the ICO. Plus I am making a further complaint!

The point is that the police are far too often dishonest. Even the Directorate of Police Standards are not infrequently dishonest!! So much for maintaining standards.

From my perspective the Met Police are systemically dishonest and cannot be trusted. The public no longer trust the Met Police. Yes, the police say there are many honest and committed officers but my personal experience tells me otherwise. I say again in my case the DPS are cynically lying over Lockett's behaviour when he violently pushed me over causing a grave, life-changing injury. 

If the organisation charged with upholding standards are inherently dishonest as appears to be the case how can we trust and respect the Metropolitan Police?

Here is a paragraph or two on the promise to root out rogue officers:

Mark Rowley and the Promise to Remove Rogue Police Officers

Since becoming Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police in September 2022, Sir Mark Rowley has repeatedly promised to rid the force of so-called “rogue” officers and restore public trust after a series of damaging scandals. His message has been clear and consistent: officers who are racist, misogynistic, corrupt, or otherwise unfit to serve should not be wearing the uniform.

Rowley has spoken publicly about a minority of officers whose behaviour undermines the legitimacy of the entire service. In interviews and speeches, he has pledged a tougher approach to misconduct, faster disciplinary processes, and a cultural reset within Britain’s largest police force. He has described the removal of unfit officers as essential to rebuilding confidence, particularly among communities who feel failed or mistreated by policing.

However, turning that promise into action has proved more complicated than rhetoric alone suggests. A significant obstacle emerged when a High Court ruling confirmed that the Metropolitan Police could not dismiss officers solely by withdrawing their vetting clearance. This decision blocked a route Rowley hoped would allow the force to remove officers who failed integrity checks but had not yet been dismissed through formal misconduct proceedings.

Rowley responded forcefully, criticising the legal framework as unworkable and calling for urgent reform. He argued that it was “absurd” for officers who failed basic vetting standards to remain in post due to procedural constraints. His stance added pressure on the government to amend police regulations.

In response, ministers announced changes to vetting rules, making failure of vetting a clear basis for dismissal. Rowley welcomed these reforms, describing them as closing a serious loophole and giving police leaders the tools they need to act decisively.

In summary, Sir Mark Rowley has undeniably promised to remove rogue officers and has pushed hard for the authority to do so. While legal barriers initially limited his ability to deliver, recent regulatory changes mean that his pledge can now be tested not by words, but by results.

-----------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also, sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. And, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable. Finally, (!) I often express an OPINION on the news. Please share yours in a comment.

Trump thinks Norway decides the Nobel Peace Prize!

Sorry but Trump is an idiot. There are many signs, the latest of which is his letter to the Norwegian president, Jonas Gahr Stoere, that he has given up on peace missions and now will concentrate on American interests which at this juncture means invading Greenland!! 😱😢 He's mad and some (many) American politicians think that he is losing his mind.

Trump is acting like an emotionally hurt 10-year-old child who petulantly demands something.

Here is the letter  - the 'moanings of a petulant child' as described by a news reporter on Sky News.

Dear Jonas:

Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a “right of ownership” anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.

Thank you!

President DJT

Stoere said he had repeatedly told Trump that the Norwegian Nobel Committee, which awards the peace prize, ‍was independent and that Norway's government had no control over it. As if he needed to be told that! He did and he did not listen. Trump is known to be a poor listener because he likes to deliver monologues to all and sundry.

-------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also, sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. And, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable. Finally, (!) I often express an OPINION on the news. Please share yours in a comment.

3 suggested European responses to Trump's Greenland tariffs

It pays to read The Times letters to the editor. This is something I've learned over the years because a lot of really clever and sensible people write to The Times. A lot of their letters don't get published but the ones that get through the vetting procedure are often very good and in this instance we have three interesting and I would argue good suggestions for how Europe can respond to Donald Trump's Greenland tariffs namely a 10% uplift to the tariff currently applied to the UK and Europe on first February and a further 25% uplift in June if European countries don't comply with his request to own Greenland.

The first suggestion comes from Professor Costas Milas of the University of Liverpool. He suggests that European countries should withdraw their national football teams from this summer's FIFA World Cup which is being held mainly in the United States. It's believed that it will bring $9.6 billion to the US economy and it would be an enormous embarrassment to Trump and the American government if this upcoming World Cup was so catastrophically damaged by mass withdrawal of European teams. That may force Trump's hand. He may become more reasonable. At the moment Trump is being highly unreasonable and his demands are simply untenable. No European country would agree to allow him to simply move into Greenland and own the island to plunder minerals which I believe is his main purpose and for personal financial gain as well I would argue.

The second suggestion comes from Colin Kennedy from Suffolk in the UK. He argues that "Europe should respond graciously and politely to the US president by stating that the leases on all US military facilities in Europe will attract a similar tariff to the one he is imposing from February 1. If payment is not forthcoming then the US should be asked to vacate all such facilities without exception.

Finally, the third suggestion comes from Simon Brown KC living in Stevington, Bedfordshire, UK. He writes this: 

"We have a powerful response available. President Trump has interests in Scotland that are close to his heart: Turnberry golf club and Trump International near Aberdeen. Sequestration and nationalisation of them by the Scottish government would deter him and would be for the public benefit and well-being.

The last suggestion would certainly hurt Trump personally. He is very fond of Scotland. We know he is addicted to golf notwithstanding the fact that he cheats and lies about his accomplishments on the golf course. That's his style. His lying is transparent when it comes to golf and his golf swing isn't that great either.

This last suggestion is very personal which I think is appropriate because he often makes things very personal. When he talks about world leaders he discusses whether they are a nice person or not. He speaks of their character. I think this is inappropriate because discussions between world leaders are about achievements not about personal characteristics. It's about doing business pragmatically and sensibly. It's inappropriate to talk about the person's character and whether you like them or not.

In any case, Trump needs to be pushed hard. Europe must stand up and show courage and a backbone. Starmer was weak before Trump in the past. He was obsequious towards him. He was a poodle towards the president and now the president is jerking Starmer around like a lapdog on a lead. Starmer asked for that. We must stand up and do the right thing and if the consequences are uncomfortable then so be it.

At the end of the day, Trump respects strong characters (look at how he talks about Vladimir Putin for instance) and is therefore more likely to listen to them and come to an agreement with strong characters.

Europeans have been heavily criticised by J.D. Vance for being weak and instigating sloppy policies. Let's see Europeans including the UK stop being weak. Let's see them beat Donald Trump at his own game.

-----------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also, sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. And, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable. Finally, (!) I often express an OPINION on the news. Please share yours in a comment.

Obsequious Starmer kicked in the teeth by disloyal Trump

The headline in The Sunday Times today is that Sir Keir Starmer, the UK's Prime Minister, is angry after Trump imposed more tariffs against the UK: 10% (on all goods?) to climb to 25% in June unless Starmer agrees to support Trump in his desire to own the world's largest island: Greenland.

You might remember the time when Starmer arrived at the White House Oval Office and presented to Trump King Charles's handwritten letter inviting the president to the UK for a state visit (his second). The intention of that special gift was to encourage Donald Trump to go easy on the UK regarding tariffs because at that time the President was setting up tariffs for pretty well every country on the planet because he regards himself as the tariff king. Note: Trump may be constitutionally unable to impose tariffs by executive order - more on that to come in the news media I suspect.

I remember Starmer acting like a poodle to the president in a very obsequious manner as mentioned. It was nauseating to see. But Starmer was naïve. You don't behave like that towards a bully with an ego as big as a house.

You have got to stand up to him and thereby gain his respect. And if in standing up you suffer tariffs then so be it. You have to stand up and be independent-minded and have dignity and self-respect. You can't kowtow and become a poodle on a lead to American's current president. Because you'll be jerked around as we are seeing at present.

And the latest development proves my point. Trump has simply ditched the concept of being friends with Starmer and imposed fresh tariffs which will hurt the UK economically. 

He's also imposed the same tariff barriers on Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Finland. But I don't recall the Prime Ministers of those countries going to the White House and begging more or less, cap in hand on bended knee, for lower tariffs. At least they maintained their dignity.

Starmer, for me, is an idiot. He is a week idiot actually. He's not a leader. He needs to show leadership and strength. He cannot regard the USA president as a friend. The special relationship between the UK and the USA which has been so lauded over decades, no longer exists at this moment.

We have to deal with the USA as a potential partner and negotiate from a position of strength.

President Trump blindsided his NATO allies yesterday when he announced these tariffs. And he announced them on his True Social website. Of course, the European leaders are also annoyed or perhaps furious as well and they must be. But they don't have egg on their faces and look stupid.

Donald Trump has embarked on a ridiculous escapade of trying to own Greenland - it has logic but it is still absurd. Trump should be entering into partnerships with the Greenlanders, Denmark and Europeans to defend the territory and in respect of mining for minerals.

He is trying to bully the world into allowing him to OWN it, in its entirety. He can't take it militarily because it is simply impossible because the island is owned by Denmark and the Greenlanders and Denmark is a NATO ally.

It said that he wants to buy it at a price of around $700 billion. That was a valuation made by academics and former US officials. It is a gross undervaluation in my view.

After the Second World War President Truman offered Denmark $100 million in gold to buy the island which equates to about $1.7 billion today. 

I would say today, bearing in mind its critical strategic position and its mineral wealth, that its value is 10 times the $700 billion quoted i.e. $7 trillion. I'm thinking long-term as the ice is melting and Greenland will become more and more valuable going forward. 

It may be an island which is critical actually to the survival of humanity if global warming precedes as it is. It may become a place where the climate is amenably pleasant in a hundred years time. There could be mass migration from the south of the planet to Greenland! And if America owns it you can imagine the wealth that they could generate under those circumstances.

I also believe that Trump, personally, wants to own Greenland because he wants to make money for himself out of the mineral deposits on the island in terms of rare earth et cetera. He has accrued quite a lot of personal wealth during his term as president. He sees the office as an opportunity to increase his wealth which is probably unconstitutional but does he care? Not at all.

Update (Politico.eu): "McLarty Associates, an international strategic advisory firm based in Washington has said that "Resisting a new attempt at humiliation and vassalization is the only way Europe can finally assert itself as a geopolitical actor." No more acting like a poodle please.

---------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also, sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. And, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable. Finally, (!) I often express an OPINION on the news. Please share yours in a comment.