There are a lot of pages across 4 sites so this custom search is very useful and pretty effective.

Wednesday, 5 August 2009


Advert


Banfield Veterinary Group Policy on Declawing


The Banfield Veterinary Group Policy on Declawing is inhumane, horribly wrong, misleading and a denial of the truth. It should be brought up to date immediately. Their policy is to condone declawing of cats for non-therapeutic purposes (to stop the cat scratching the furniture). Kim Van Syoc, Senior Communications Specialist for Banfield tells us the reason for their policy, which I summarise below (I cannot quote verbatim as it would be a breach of copyright so this is a fair and accurate summary but there is a link to the original About.com article just below).


The Banfield Policy:

Banfield perform declawing operations if they believe that a cat can't be trained to stop using its claws to scratch furniture or they pose a danger to family members. She says that not all cats are amenable to "behaviour modification". She says that fewer cats will be abandoned and euthanised if the cat is declawed. Recovery is very rapid, she says, leading to a stronger bond between cat and person. {note: Kim Van Syoc, Senior Communications Specialist for Banfield calls declawing "onchiectomy"}


This is totally misleading and simply incorrect. They follow the AVMA policy on declawing cats which is also wholly inhumane.

Firstly, it should be pointed out that onchiectomy is the castration of a man! It is not declawing which is onychectomy. If this is a direct quote from Miss Syoc, which I am told it is, then she doesn't know much about declawing does she? The original posting on About.com is here (new window). It may have been changed as a result of this article as it is very embarassing.

Secondly, the concept of training an animal to do what we want is incorrect. If we don't like what a cat does we shouldn't keep a cat - simple. That one act of not keeping a cat would reduce the feral cat problem massively over time. So vets encourage irresponsible ownership by declawing. They foster the idea and encourage the notion that we can modify a cat's anatomy to suit us. That debases the animal and leads to more abandonments and an arrogant approach to cat keeping that is wholly against the interests of the cat's wellbeing. Banfield, you are encouraging bad behaviour in people who keep cats. You encourage the wrong people to keep cats.

Question to Kim Van Syoc. Even on the basis that your policy is OK (which is obviously is not) how do you manage it? Do you ask people about how they tried to train their cat? No. Do you instruct them how to train their cat if what they are doing is incorrect? No. Do you even check if they are training their cat? No.

"Behaviour modification" needs to be directed at the people not the cat. It is the people who need to be trained. Trained to stop seeing the companion cat as a "possession" to do with as we please. These people are getting confused between a cat and a sofa. One is living and the other is dead. The former feels pain and the latter doesn't. Got it!

It is false to say that declawing prevents abandonment. This is just something the veterinarians peddle around the place to support their mutilation of companion cats. They use it as the main argument to justify this inhumane behaviour. In a scientific review of research into complications of declawing surgery it was found that:

"..........declawed cats were at an increased risk of relinquishment"

Gary J. Patronek, VMD, PhD: Assessment of claims of short- and long-term complications associated with onychectomy in cats.

Please read this Miss Kim Van Syoc: Declawing cat kills more cats.

Finally, there is no definitive scientific evidence (and vets must work from science and not hearsay) that cats recovery rapidly after declawing.

In conclusion Miss Syoc your arguments are worse than poor. They are misleading and the Banfield Veterinary Group Policy on Declawing results in the mutilation of innocent animals and encourages irresponsible cat ownership leading to more mass slaughter of unwanted cats that are already slaughtered by the millions in America every year.



From Banfield Veterinary Group Policy on Declawing to Home Page

Advert

4 comments:

kattaddorra said...

If this Kim Van Syoc is the Senior Communications Specialist for Banfield and is a representative of the sort of people who work for Banfield,then that is shocking! That she doesn't even use the correct term for declawing just shows how little regard these people have for cats.
Who are they trying to fool that declawing is done in their clinics as a last resort ? Declawing kittens is far from a last resort,it's far too easy for lazy selfish owners to have a kitten's toe ends amputated rather than buy it a scratching post.Neuter/declaw packages encourage these people and of course put more money in Banfield's bank account.
I wish everyone would boycott Banfields 730 + veterinary hospitals, until they stop the mutilation of many cats and kittens, once and for all

Susan said...

I agree we need to BOYCOTT Banfield, and PetsMart stores as well since many of the Banfield clinics are inside their stores, until they discontinue cat abuse & dismemberment. In 2006, Banfield started marketing declawing in their Optimum Wellness Plan for "preventative health care" for kittens - check it out: ohttp://network.bestfriends.org/groups/celebrateclawsnotdeclaw/news/archive/2006/10/30/action-alert-from-avar-national-veterinary-clinic-chain-promotes-cat-declawing.aspx

They've made great progress for humanity towards the dogs, now they need to step up to the plate and start protecting healthy cat paws instead of needlessly destroying them!

Everycat said...

The idea that cats recover quickly from this hateful surgery probably stems from the depressing inability of so many vets and vet techs to identify feline expression of pain. It's laziness, pure and simple, along with a deeply ingrained belief that the findings of behavioural science on pain expression are not worth attending to.

The common practice of offering pain relief as "optional" is proof that many members of the veterinary profession in the USA have gone right off the rails and lost any trace of humaneness.

Disgusting.

Freddie Fox said...

Thanks for your comments. We are three of a kind. We hate this curse that hangs over the lives of the domestic cat in the US.