- Stopping residents feeding them at feeding stations. They intend to remove the stations.
- Relocation the colony
- Bricking up access points under the buildings where the cats have made dens.
Wednesday 30 October 2024
Crisis looms for 100 feral cats occupying Denver apartment complex
The moment when a feral cat trusts you is magical
"I don't think non-cat people understand what it means to gain the trust of a feral cat, it's not easy & when it happens it's so incredibly beautiful" - commenter on the video below which is on TikTok
Her feral cat finally lets herself be loved by this nice lady, Quin. He partner rescued the cat who'd been around their home for a while with her kittens. |
"She had to be brave surviving out there in the wild. She is actually a very sweet cat. You can tell she wants to be loved. She didn't give any fuss when I put her little cat collar on her. I feel like she knew it was hers and it meant she was ours," Quin (the rescuer) said. She lives in Texas, US.
Tuesday 29 October 2024
Taliban exclude women from workforce but need financial support from the West
The Taliban’s restrictions on Afghan women and girls are extensive and have intensified since they took over Afghanistan in August 2021. These restrictions primarily stem from an ultra-conservative interpretation of Islamic law and are enforced in ways that drastically curtail women’s rights and freedoms in daily life. Here are some of the main restrictions the Taliban has imposed:
1. Education Ban
- Secondary and University Education: Since their return to power, the Taliban banned girls from attending high school, and in 2023 they extended this ban to universities, effectively cutting off formal education for women and girls beyond sixth grade.
- Vocational Training and Tutoring Centers: Private tutoring centers that educate women and girls have also been shut down, and alternative education initiatives have faced restrictions.
- International Scholarships and Travel for Education: Afghan women are also prevented from traveling abroad to pursue higher education or accessing international scholarships.
2. Employment and Economic Restrictions
- Government and NGO Employment Ban: Afghan women have been barred from working in government offices and NGOs, with few exceptions, which has significantly affected their economic independence.
- Employment Outside the Home: Women’s opportunities to work outside the home are extremely limited, particularly in professional fields. This has led to a sharp decline in women’s participation in the Afghan workforce.
- Family Dependency: These bans have forced many women to depend solely on male family members for financial support, which can be especially difficult in cases where women are widows or the sole providers in their households.
3. Public and Social Life Restrictions
- Dress Code and Hijab Requirements: Women are required to wear a full-body covering, typically a burqa, in public, with limited exceptions.
- Restrictions on Movement: Women are generally not allowed to travel alone; a male guardian, known as a mahram, must accompany them for any travel beyond a short distance.
- Ban on Accessing Public Parks and Gyms: In 2022, the Taliban banned women from parks, gyms, and other recreational facilities, further restricting social interaction and access to public spaces.
- Limitations on Personal Expression: Women are restricted from speaking loudly in public or raising their voices. The recent ban on women hearing other women’s voices also suggests restrictions on social interaction, media, and music.
4. Media and Cultural Restrictions
- Representation in Media: Women have been banned from appearing in TV dramas and other media productions. Female newscasters and reporters are no longer allowed to present or cover news on television.
- Music and Singing: In addition to limiting women’s roles in media, the Taliban has enforced bans on music and singing in public spaces, including music performed or enjoyed by women.
5. Legal Rights and Protections
- Marriage and Family Law: Women are often pressured into arranged marriages, including underage marriages, which are legally and culturally enforced under Taliban governance.
- Protection from Violence: The Taliban has dismantled or severely limited institutions, such as family courts and shelters, that previously supported women experiencing domestic violence or abuse, leaving women vulnerable to violence without recourse to justice.
- Limited Access to Justice: Under the Taliban, Afghan women face significant barriers to accessing the legal system, particularly in cases involving disputes over marriage, divorce, custody, and inheritance, where decisions often favor male family members.
These restrictions represent a drastic rollback of the rights women had gained over the past two decades and have led to international condemnation. The lack of access to education, employment, public spaces, and even basic forms of social interaction has made Afghanistan one of the most challenging places in the world for women to live, with lasting impacts on Afghan society as a whole.
The claim that the U.S. or Western countries send $40 million in cash weekly directly to the Taliban is not accurate. However, there are nuances around international aid and financial assistance flowing into Afghanistan, primarily aimed at supporting humanitarian efforts in a country facing severe economic and humanitarian crises.
Here’s a breakdown of how this aid process works and where the funds go:
1. Humanitarian Aid Flow to Afghanistan
- Since the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in August 2021, the international community has continued to provide humanitarian aid, as the country faces severe poverty, food shortages, and healthcare crises.
- Much of this aid is managed through international organizations like the United Nations, the World Food Programme, and other humanitarian agencies, rather than being given directly to the Taliban.
- The U.S., as well as other countries and international organizations, contributes to this aid, which helps prevent economic collapse, hunger, and disease but is specifically allocated for humanitarian needs rather than government functions.
2. Afghan Central Bank and Limited Cash Infusions
- After the Taliban took over, Afghanistan’s central bank assets (mostly held overseas, particularly in the U.S.) were frozen to prevent the Taliban from accessing them.
- A small portion of these funds has since been unfrozen and distributed as cash shipments to Afghanistan, often around $40 million a week, but these funds do not go to the Taliban. They are carefully monitored and distributed by the United Nations and related organizations to support critical services and humanitarian needs, like food and healthcare.
- The aim of these cash infusions is to stabilize the economy and help prevent total collapse, which would further devastate the Afghan people, while avoiding direct support to the Taliban’s governance.
3. Restricted Taliban Access
- The Taliban have limited direct access to these funds, which are meant strictly for humanitarian purposes and are distributed through NGOs and international bodies. The U.S. has also set up mechanisms to ensure the Taliban cannot use these assets for governance or military purposes.
- The funds are tracked to ensure they are not used in ways that would violate international sanctions or end up under Taliban control.
4. Controversies and Concerns
- Despite these controls, there are concerns about the Taliban’s indirect benefit from international assistance, especially since they are effectively the governing authority. The Taliban could potentially exert influence over NGOs or other agencies distributing aid, though international organizations take measures to prevent this.
- Some argue that humanitarian aid inadvertently stabilizes Taliban rule by easing public discontent. However, the international community maintains that this aid is essential to protect Afghan civilians from severe deprivation.
In summary, while approximately $40 million is sent to Afghanistan in weekly cash shipments, these funds are strictly for humanitarian purposes and are not intended for Taliban use. They are managed by international organizations to ensure they support only humanitarian objectives, with strict oversight to prevent misuse.
Excluding women from the workforce is indeed economically detrimental, especially for a country like Afghanistan that is already on the brink of financial collapse. Preventing half of the population from participating in wealth-creating activities has significant economic and social repercussions that can accelerate the country’s economic decline. Here’s why this policy can be seen as particularly damaging in Afghanistan’s context:
1. Loss of Labor and Skills
- Afghanistan’s economy is heavily dependent on its workforce, and women have historically played vital roles in various sectors, including healthcare, education, and business.
- By barring women from the workplace, Afghanistan loses a substantial portion of its skilled labor, which can’t be easily replaced. Fields like healthcare and education, which were already under-resourced, are now struggling even more, resulting in a serious loss of service quality.
- Women in technical roles, such as engineers, economists, and administrators, also provided critical skills that were contributing to the country’s infrastructure and services.
2. Reduced Household Incomes and Rising Poverty
- Afghanistan has one of the highest poverty rates in the world, and women in the workforce provided essential income to support their families, especially in single-parent or widow-led households.
- Without female earnings, many families are unable to meet basic needs, pushing more Afghan households into poverty. This, in turn, can lead to a downward spiral of increased economic dependency, higher rates of malnutrition, and even forced child labor.
3. Impact on the GDP and Economy
- Women’s economic participation significantly boosts GDP in any country. According to the World Bank, female labor participation can directly impact national productivity and income. In Afghanistan, estimates suggest that female workers contributed notably to sectors like agriculture, manufacturing, and services.
- By excluding women from the workforce, Afghanistan has shrunk its economy, reducing its ability to generate tax revenue, attract foreign investment, and grow sustainably.
4. Isolation from International Aid and Investment
- The Taliban’s restrictions on women’s rights have led to international sanctions and limited Afghanistan’s access to the global economy. Countries and organizations that provided aid, funding, and investment are now reluctant to engage due to the Taliban’s treatment of women and girls.
- Foreign governments and agencies are more hesitant to invest in a country where half of the workforce is effectively banned from working, which further restricts Afghanistan’s economic recovery.
5. Long-Term Human Capital Damage
- Afghanistan’s young generation of women is growing up without access to education or meaningful employment opportunities, creating a “lost generation” with limited skills and job readiness.
- Over time, this depletes the country’s human capital and limits its prospects for future economic development, as education and skilled employment are foundational to an economy’s growth and innovation potential.
6. Negative Social and Health Impacts
- Social impacts from poverty, malnutrition, and lack of education compound when women are barred from contributing economically. These stressors affect family well-being, increase health risks, and create a cycle of poverty that’s hard to break.
- Additionally, Afghanistan faces a shortage of female healthcare professionals due to the employment ban, which particularly affects women’s healthcare, including maternal and reproductive services. This can lead to worsened public health outcomes and a higher mortality rate among women and children.
7. Missed Opportunities for Economic Diversification
- The Afghan economy has long been dependent on foreign aid and agriculture, but diversifying into areas like services, textiles, and small business entrepreneurship offered pathways to greater economic resilience. Women played significant roles in these sectors, especially in rural and community-based economies.
- By shutting women out, the Taliban further restricts the country’s economic diversification, leaving Afghanistan more vulnerable to economic shocks and less self-sufficient.
In Summary
By excluding women from the workforce, the Taliban is not only limiting Afghanistan’s immediate economic capacity but also stunting its long-term growth potential. The economic costs of sidelining women are high and can accelerate the country’s economic isolation and decline. Allowing women to work, on the other hand, would be an obvious step toward alleviating poverty, improving family welfare, and stabilizing the Afghan economy in the long run.
Monday 28 October 2024
If Trump is so ill-suited to being the next president, why is he so close to being the next president?
This post was written by AI - ChatGPT on my instructions. AI is able to research far more widely than me and provide detailed answers to questions beyond the ability of a single individual with time restrictions! This is why millions of websites are dying as I type this.
I have some real concerns about what another Trump presidency means for women in this country — and I wanted to share some of my thoughts. If this resonates with you, send this video to every single person you know and remind them what’s at stake in this election. pic.twitter.com/7bCX31bP8b
— Michelle Obama (@MichelleObama) October 28, 2024
The phenomenon of Donald Trump remaining a viable candidate for the U.S. presidency despite widespread controversy and negative perceptions boils down to several key factors. These include polarization, his political branding, distrust in institutions, media dynamics, and cultural shifts in American politics. Here’s how these elements contribute to his continued popularity:
1. Political Polarization and Identity Politics
- Strong Base Support: Trump’s supporters are intensely loyal, often identifying with his views on issues like immigration, economic nationalism, and skepticism toward the establishment. For many, his appeal transcends typical political qualifications because they feel he represents their values or frustrations with the system.
- Divisive but Compelling Persona: American politics has grown more polarized, with many people feeling a strong emotional pull to align against or with Trump. This polarization deepens allegiance to Trump among his base, while his detractors solidify his status as a “fighter” against what they perceive as political or cultural elites.
2. Disillusionment with Establishment Politics
- Distrust of Government Institutions: Many Americans have lost faith in traditional institutions, feeling that these entities no longer serve the public fairly. Trump has capitalized on this distrust, positioning himself as a figure outside the “corrupt” establishment, even though he’s held the highest office.
- Disruption as a Selling Point: For a segment of voters, his abrasive style and unconventional approach are not disqualifying but are precisely why they support him. His willingness to break norms is seen as a rejection of a political system they believe no longer represents them.
3. Strong Political Brand and Media Savvy
- Mastering the Media: Trump’s understanding of the media landscape enables him to stay highly visible. His statements often generate sensational coverage, keeping him in the public eye. This media omnipresence, even if negative, serves as free advertising and fuels both his notoriety and his influence.
- Message Control: His brand — as a “successful businessman” and “strong leader” — appeals to many who believe in the American Dream or who admire his persona as a political outsider. This image persists despite controversies, as he continuously emphasizes achievements he associates with his first term.
4. The Conservative Media Ecosystem
- Conservative news sources often portray Trump positively, countering mainstream media’s more critical stance. Fox News, talk radio, and newer platforms like Newsmax and social media influencers amplify messages that resonate with Trump’s base. This helps him retain a core following that is less affected by mainstream narratives.
5. Strategic Republican Support
- Unifying the GOP: Despite internal GOP tensions, Trump has maintained significant support within the Republican Party. Many Republican leaders see his popularity as essential for their own electoral success, even if they privately disagree with him. The base Trump commands is large enough that alienating him could mean losing power altogether.
6. Populist Appeal and Economic Grievances
- Populism and Economic Frustration: Economic uncertainty, wage stagnation, and rising costs have fueled populist sentiments. Trump’s messaging taps into these concerns by focusing on “forgotten Americans” and framing his policies as directly benefiting them. This appeal resonates especially in regions affected by deindustrialization and job loss.
7. Opponent Challenges and Electoral System Dynamics
- Voter Reluctance on Opponents: Some voters dislike Trump but feel alienated by the Democratic Party or specific candidates, including Joe Biden. This dissatisfaction can lead to votes for Trump, even if they come reluctantly.
- Electoral College Structure: The U.S. Electoral College means that victory hinges on winning key swing states rather than the popular vote. Trump’s strategy focuses on flipping a few battleground states rather than courting a national majority, making his path to victory feasible even with limited popularity nationwide.
8. Legal Troubles and Perception of Persecution
- “Persecution” Narrative: Trump’s legal battles, which might weaken another candidate, reinforce his base’s perception that he is being unfairly targeted by political enemies. For supporters, these investigations confirm their belief that he is standing up against a system rigged against them.
9. Shifting Cultural Norms Around Leadership
- Trump’s tenure has arguably altered the qualities people look for in leaders. For many Americans, traditional notions of statesmanship, diplomacy, or even “presidential” behavior have taken a backseat to directness and perceived authenticity. Trump embodies a shift away from traditional decorum toward a more combative style that appeals to those seeking assertiveness in their leaders.
The Result: Narrow, Yet Feasible Pathway
Given these factors, Trump’s path to re-election is narrower than it was in 2016 but remains plausible. His ability to turn even controversies to his advantage, combined with political polarization, a fiercely loyal base, and a divided opposition, means he’s retained a strong position within the Republican Party and American politics more broadly. In a tightly contested electoral environment, that base of support, combined with swing states and anti-establishment sentiment, may be enough to keep him competitive.
BREAKING: In a stunning announcement, Donald Trump admits he’ll implement Project 2025’s plan to gut the civil service and create a more politically driven government. It’s one of the ways Trump plans to abuse his power. Retweet so all Americans see this.pic.twitter.com/MR5CTqrW2G
— Kamala’s Wins (@harris_wins) October 27, 2024
Domestic cat benefits from being more social
Featured Post
i hate cats
i hate cats, no i hate f**k**g cats is what some people say when they dislike cats. But they nearly always don't explain why. It appe...
Popular posts
-
The big Maine Coon cat (MC) is very impressive and the biggest purely domestic cat in the world (I am excluding the wildcat hybrids ) but no...
-
Photo of Nebelung Cat Lovenblues Mozart Bronikowski copyright © Helmi Flick – please respect copyright. The Nebelung has a medi...
-
Russian Blue Kitten photograph by Sensual Shadows Photography Before you go in search of Russian Blue Kittens have a look at these and h...