Sunday, 29 September 2024

Americans stunned after learning ingredients in US McDonald's compared to UK's. US men DIE YOUNGER.

American men have an average lifespan of  76.33 years. UK men have an average lifespan of 80.70 years. Although there are many reasons for this difference, one is diet including fast food differences. Take a look at this picture and a fuller written picture below.

Update October 3, 2024: The Times newspaper reports that "Middle-aged Britons slimmer and healthier than US peers". That said, UK residents are also pretty unhealthy with an obesity epidemic! However, a study found that middle-aged Britons are slimmer, healthier and less likely to suffer heart problems than their peers in the US. British adults are less likely to be obese and also have lower rates of diabetes, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. In the US, 40% were obese compared with 35% in the UK. 23% of Americans had high blood pressure and 11% had high cholesterol compared with rates of 19 and 8% respectively in the UK. There are many reasons for this, one of which is diet referred to on this page but there may also be an input from the health service available in the UK and in the USA. In my opinion, the problem is linked to obesity and overeating. That's the core of the problem because being obese carries with it numerous health problems. There is no doubt that it shortens life substantially on average.


Why do American men have a shorter lifespan than British men?


Note: below this section is one on diet which explores the facts in the image above.

The shorter lifespan of American men compared to British men can be attributed to several interrelated factors. Here are some of the key reasons:

1. Healthcare System

  • Access to healthcare: The U.S. has a more privatized healthcare system, which can create barriers to accessing medical care, especially for lower-income individuals. In contrast, the U.K. has the National Health Service (NHS), which provides universal healthcare free at the point of delivery, allowing more consistent and early access to healthcare services for the entire population.
  • Preventive care: Americans, particularly those without insurance, may delay or avoid seeking preventive care due to cost concerns. This can lead to the later detection of diseases and worse outcomes, which impacts life expectancy.

2. Obesity and Diet

  • Obesity rates: The U.S. has higher rates of obesity than the U.K. Obesity is a significant risk factor for various health issues, including heart disease, diabetes, and certain cancers, all of which can shorten lifespan. Poor diet and a sedentary lifestyle are more prevalent in the U.S.
  • Dietary differences: Processed and fast foods, which are often high in sugar, fat, and salt, are more widely consumed in the U.S., contributing to chronic health conditions.

3. Income Inequality and Poverty

  • Economic disparities: The U.S. has higher levels of income inequality than the U.K., which translates to disparities in access to healthcare, housing, nutrition, and other essentials. Economic stress and poorer living conditions can exacerbate health problems, increasing mortality rates.
  • Social safety nets: The U.K. has more robust social programs that reduce poverty and provide support, such as welfare and housing assistance. These programs can help mitigate the adverse health effects of poverty and provide stability, potentially extending life expectancy.

4. Gun Violence and Homicide Rates

  • Gun-related deaths: The U.S. has much higher rates of gun violence, including homicides and suicides, which disproportionately affect men. This contributes directly to lower life expectancy in American men, especially young and middle-aged men.
  • Homicide rates: The U.S. has a higher homicide rate than the U.K., and this violent crime disproportionately affects men.

5. Substance Abuse and Mental Health

  • Opioid crisis: The U.S. has faced a severe opioid crisis, which has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives, primarily affecting men. Overdose deaths have significantly reduced life expectancy in certain regions of the U.S.
  • Mental health: Mental health care in the U.S. can be expensive and less accessible, leading to untreated conditions such as depression and anxiety. The combination of untreated mental health issues and easy access to firearms may explain higher suicide rates among American men compared to British men.

6. Work-life Balance and Stress

  • Work culture: Americans tend to work longer hours and take fewer vacations than their British counterparts, leading to higher levels of stress. Chronic stress is linked to many health issues, such as cardiovascular disease and weakened immune function.
  • Social determinants of health: Factors like job security, income, and social status all play a role in life expectancy. The American work culture may expose men to more work-related stress, which negatively affects overall health.

7. Environmental Factors

  • Air pollution: While both the U.S. and U.K. experience pollution, certain areas of the U.S. have higher levels of pollution, particularly in urban centers. Poor air quality is linked to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, which can shorten life expectancy.
  • Climate and geography: Some regions of the U.S. are more prone to extreme weather, such as heatwaves, which can be fatal, especially for vulnerable populations.

8. Lifestyle and Cultural Differences

  • Smoking and alcohol consumption: While smoking rates have declined in both countries, the U.S. has higher alcohol consumption and binge drinking rates, which can lead to liver disease, accidents, and other health issues.
  • Physical activity: Americans generally engage in less physical activity compared to British men, contributing to higher rates of obesity and associated diseases.

9. Maternal Mortality and Infant Health

  • Infant and maternal mortality: The U.S. has a higher infant and maternal mortality rate than the U.K., which is indicative of broader healthcare system issues and negatively impacts overall life expectancy figures.

In summary, while both American and British men face many similar health challenges, systemic factors like the healthcare system, higher rates of obesity and substance abuse, more violence, and greater economic inequality contribute to the shorter lifespan of American men compared to British men.

The American Big Mac burger contains more calories, more fat and more salt and additives than the British version. Is this an indication of the underlying differences in diet?

Yes, the differences in the composition of the American and British Big Mac are indicative of broader dietary trends and food culture between the two countries. The fact that the American Big Mac contains more calories, fat, salt, and additives compared to its British counterpart reflects key underlying differences in diet and food standards that could impact health and life expectancy.

Here are some ways in which the difference between these two versions of the Big Mac highlights broader dietary contrasts:

1. Food Standards and Regulations

  • Ingredient regulations: The U.K. and European Union (which governed U.K. food laws until Brexit) have stricter regulations on food additives, preservatives, and artificial ingredients. This can lead to lower levels of unhealthy additives in processed foods in the U.K. compared to the U.S., where food industry standards are more lenient.
  • Trans fats: The U.S. historically allowed higher levels of trans fats, which contribute to heart disease, though these have been increasingly regulated in recent years. In the U.K., trans fats were banned earlier, reflecting a difference in public health priorities.

2. Portion Sizes

  • Larger portions in the U.S.: In general, portion sizes tend to be larger in the U.S. than in the U.K., especially for fast food. The higher calorie content of the American Big Mac could be reflective of a cultural trend towards supersized portions, which contributes to higher caloric intake and obesity rates.
  • Perception of value: U.S. fast food culture often equates larger portions with better value, which encourages overconsumption, while the U.K. typically favors smaller, more controlled portions.

3. Salt and Sugar Intake

  • Higher salt and sugar levels: The American Big Mac contains more salt, which reflects broader dietary trends in the U.S. where high-sodium processed foods are more common. Excessive salt consumption is linked to hypertension and heart disease, which are more prevalent in the U.S.
  • Hidden sugars: Processed foods in the U.S. often contain more added sugars, even in savory items. This has been linked to the rise in obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome in the U.S.

4. Obesity Rates and Health Outcomes

  • Higher obesity rates in the U.S.: The U.S. has a significantly higher obesity rate than the U.K., with almost 40% of American adults classified as obese compared to about 27% in the U.K. The nutritional composition of fast foods like the Big Mac plays a role in these differences. The higher fat, calorie, and sodium content in American fast food reflects a broader trend toward energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods, contributing to obesity and related diseases.
  • Chronic diseases: The high fat and calorie content of processed foods in the U.S. is a major factor in the higher prevalence of heart disease, diabetes, and other chronic conditions, which are key contributors to the shorter lifespan of American men compared to British men.

5. Cultural Attitudes Toward Food

  • Convenience and fast food culture: In the U.S., fast food is a staple of the diet for many, often consumed more frequently than in the U.K. Americans tend to have a more fast-paced lifestyle, which encourages the consumption of quick, convenient, and often unhealthy meals. In contrast, while fast food is popular in the U.K., there is a stronger cultural emphasis on home-cooked meals and a more traditional approach to meal times.
  • Food marketing: The fast food industry in the U.S. is highly competitive and promotes value meals and larger portions aggressively. This is less of a focus in the U.K., where there has been more public pressure on the food industry to promote healthier options.

6. Public Health Campaigns

  • Health awareness: In the U.K., there have been stronger public health campaigns aimed at reducing sugar and salt consumption, particularly through government regulation and media. Initiatives like the sugar tax on soft drinks and clearer food labeling are more prominent in the U.K. These measures encourage healthier consumer choices, which are less emphasized in the U.S. until more recently.

7. Culinary Traditions

  • Traditional diets: In the U.K., while fast food is available, traditional British meals, particularly home-cooked meals, are typically lower in calories and fat compared to the average American diet. The Mediterranean influence on European diets also emphasizes healthier fats (like olive oil) and more fresh produce.
  • Processed foods: In contrast, the American diet often incorporates more highly processed foods, including ready-made meals and snacks, which tend to be higher in calories, unhealthy fats, and preservatives.

8. Pricing and Accessibility

  • Cheap, unhealthy food: In the U.S., highly processed, calorie-dense foods are often cheaper and more accessible than healthier, fresh options. Fast food is often seen as a cost-effective option for many families, contributing to poorer dietary habits overall.
  • Healthier alternatives: In the U.K., while price disparities exist, there has been a push toward making healthier food more affordable and accessible through government initiatives and market changes.

Conclusion

The nutritional differences between the American and British versions of the Big Mac are a microcosm of broader dietary patterns in each country. The U.S. diet tends to be higher in calories, fat, salt, and additives, which contributes to obesity, heart disease, and other health issues that reduce life expectancy. In contrast, 

----------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also, sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. And, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable. Finally, (!) I often express an OPINION on the news. Please share yours in a comment.

Saturday, 28 September 2024

Britain temporarily becomes Russia in imprisoning non-violent climate change activist for two years

Britain temporarily becomes Russia in imprisoning non-violent climate change activists for two years
Phoebe Plummer. Her X image.

NEWS AND COMMENT, UK: Of course this is my opinion. Share yours please. Many will disagree with me and they will be wrong. 😱 Britain has temporarily become Russia under Putin: a repressive state with a mindless, establishment judge hammering a couple of courageous protesters campaigning under the Just Stop Oil banner by imprisoning them for two years in the case of one protester and 18 months for the other for throwing Heinz soup over a Vincent van Gogh sunflower painting protected by glass in the National Gallery.



They knew that the painting was protected by glass. The prosecution argument is that the soup MAY have damaged the 17th-century frame. We don't know whether it was or wasn't. I doubt whether it was damaged. We should know. 

So what they did was entirely visual. It was a visual statement and it worked in that sense. It has received lots of publicity but this government wants to stamp on perfectly respectful protests. Protests about climate change, which presents an extensional threat to the planet.

It is the young people of today who are nervous about the future because of climate change and other developments. The two women jailed for this extortionate amount of time for an entirely non-violent protest on a critical matter of importance to the survival of humankind are Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland. Plummer told the hearing at which she was sentenced to 2 years in prison that she will take the punishment on the chin and smile.


Given the existential threat of global warming, the actions of the Just Stop Oil protestors can be seen as just and proper, even if they broke the law in doing so. Their protest caused no physical damage, did not lead to disorder, and was motivated by a genuine concern for the future of the planet. Rather than being punished, these activists should be recognized for their role in raising awareness of a global crisis that demands urgent attention. Praising rather than punishing them would not only acknowledge the gravity of the climate crisis, but also send a message that civil disobedience in the name of a just cause is a vital tool for driving social and political change.

Lousy judge


I think she's a wonderful person. As is Anna Holland. The horrible judge, part of the establishment, who I would totally disrespect because of this unwarranted punishment, is Judge Christopher Hehir. He signalled beforehand that he would punish them severely and he has. A ghastly man. He is taking orders from the government, I would allege which is illegal.

He appears to have justified the punishment in saying the following. They crossed the line from "concerned campaigner to fanatic". In addition he said that the "cultural treasure" could have been "seriously damaged or even destroy".

That is entirely incorrect. This judge, I think, is showing his hatred for these protesters. He is allowing his emotions to affect his judgement which should be an objective process, a fair process. Yes, this couple of young women should be punished for causing minor, very minor criminal damage I would argue in the cause of a great protest but it should be a very mild punishment (a small fine) because their cause is critical to the survival of the planet.

The lawyer representing the couple said that they knew there was glass over the painting and therefore the painting would not be damaged. The judge got this entirely wrong.

New copy protest


And remarkably, three new Just Stop Oil protesters have now been arrested on suspicion of criminal damage after they threw some more soup over two versions of Vincent van Gogh's sunflowers at the National Gallery. This is a fresh protest in protest over the overly harsh sentencing of the couple of young women now languishing in jail.

This recent development is a great one. Judges can't go on imprisoning protesters and campaigners against the continued burning of oil and gas, exacerbating climate change, in the UK because firstly there are not enough spaces in prison to imprison these people because of a lack of prison construction over the years.

Madness of imprisonment


And secondly, this government has decided that imprisonment is not a good form of punishment. They recently released over 1,500 prisoners. These were men who committed real crimes. This government is releasing genuine criminals, often harden criminals, who are in and out of jail all the time and imprisoning people who are fighting for the survival of humankind! It is totally bonkers.

This new group of three Just Stop Oil activists been arrested and they made a good point. Their spokesperson, Phil Green, said that the 25 supporters of their group now currently in jail would be regarded by future generations as being "prisoners of conscience" and on the right side of history.

This is a good video. Important:


In future years we will look back at the imprisonment of these activists has wholly incorrect and unwarranted. We will look back at the madness of it. These people are doing something good. This should be praised. They have been forced into carrying out these dramatic protests in order to get the attention of the media and the government. If the government was doing something about global warming they'd be no protests. Just Stop Oil wouldn't exist if governments worldwide were doing their job and making genuine progress on protecting the planet.

The suffragettes’ struggle is an excellent analogy for today’s climate activism. Like the suffragettes, climate activists are working for a just and necessary cause in the face of institutional inertia and societal resistance. The harsh punishments they face today may one day be seen, as the suffragettes’ punishments are now, as unjust responses to moral bravery. Just as we now honor the suffragettes for their role in advancing human rights, future generations may honor today's environmental activists for their role in protecting the planet.

-------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also, sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. And, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable. Finally, (!) I often express an OPINION on the news. Please share yours in a comment.

Friday, 27 September 2024

Laura Loomer advised Trump to accuse immigrants of eating pet cats?

This is another sort of conspiracy theory swirling around the high-profile story of Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio eating pet cats which has now been totally debunked by the way. There is good hard evidence of it but a social media influencer and self-proclaimed investigative journalists, Laura Loomer, travelled with Donald Trump on his plane as I understand it before the debate that he had with Kamala Harris and this points to the possibility that she influenced him to bring up the Haitian immigrant pet eating story.

Laura Loomer advised Trump to accuse immigrants of eating pet cats?
Laura Loomer (right) traveled with ex-President Donald Trump (left) this week to the debate and a 9/11 memorial ceremony (Picture: X/@LauraLoomer).


To support this, she tweeted to her 1.2 million followers before the debate about "disturbing reports came out this weekend about Haitian immigrants eating people's pets in Ohio".


So she appears to have believed it before it was debunked and she's close to Donald Trump and has been for some time and as mentioned sometimes travels with him and so the theory is that she influenced him to utter those fatal words because Donald Trump had no evidence to support what he said about Haitian immigrants feeding pets but he went ahead and did it claiming that it was on television!

He looked like a fool and he had egg on his face the days afterwards. A source close to the Trump campaign expressed 100% concern around her closeness to the former president. This person who's unnamed believes that the relationship isn't working. However, another anonymous source said that Loomer did not participate in this debate preparations and that overall she was a positive person to be around for Trump.

Loomer was born in Arizona and she's worked as a commentator for the far-rate activist group Project Veritas. She ran unsuccessfully as a Congressional candidate in the sunshine state twice including in central California and 2022.

Loomer also accompanied Donald Trump to an event the next day (the day after the debate) commemorating the 9/11 attacks. And she has also attended numerous events at Trump's Mar-a-Largo home.

-------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also, sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. And, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable. Finally, (!) I often express an OPINION on the news. Please share yours in a comment.

Turkish family that walks on all fours affected by an inherited brain malfunction affecting balance

NEWS AND OPINION: The purpose of this article is to correct what I see as a very misleading headline on the Internet today on the Indy 100 website. The headline is: "Family that walk on all fours have 'undone the last three million years of evolution'". The article does discuss a medical issue but the headline is clickbait.

It's misleading as I said. I explain why below:

The family in Türkiye (Turkey) that walks on all fours suffers from a health issue known as non-progressive congenital cerebellar ataxia. This condition affects the cerebellum, the part of the brain responsible for balance and coordination. Due to this genetic mutation, the affected individuals have difficulty maintaining the balance required for bipedal walking, leading them to develop a quadrupedal gait.

Are they the only Turkish family affected? There have been reports primarily focused on a specific family in Turkey known for walking on all fours, but it's not common for multiple families to exhibit this behaviour. The most studied case involved a small group from a rural area who displayed this unique locomotion due to a neurological condition affecting balance and coordination. This phenomenon is quite rare, and while there may be isolated instances, the majority of individuals do not walk this way. 



P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also, sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. And, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable. Finally, (!) I often express an OPINION on the news. Please share yours in a comment.

Thursday, 26 September 2024

Is Katie Price the UK's most inept pet owner? While bankrupt she has bought another for £8,000.

Katie Price is known for her addiction to plastic surgery often in Türkiye where it is considerably cheaper but more dangerous, her bankruptcy for owing £.75 million to the tax man, for living in 'Mucky Mansion' a rambling messy home in Essex and for losing a large number of pets through traffic accidents on the road. And yet she continues to adopt them. 

Actually the better description is 'buy them' as she always buys purebreds and on this occasion she has bought a £8,000 Sphynx, the hairless cat breed which needs extra caregiving but which she is unqualified to discharge because she is such a hopeless pet caregiver than PETA offered her $5,000 to stop adopting pets and sign an agreement to that effect. She refused. And to pay £8k for a cat is madness. I think she was ripped off. They saw her coming.

Price with her new Sphyx kitten. Photo: Backgrid. 



Here are some details courtesy my best mate, ChatGPT:

Katie Price, a British media personality, has owned numerous pets over the years, and unfortunately, many of them have met tragic fates. Here is a summary of some of her most known pets and their causes of death:

Dogs

  1. Rolo (Puppy - French Bulldog)
  • Cause of Death: Suffocated under an armchair in 2020.
  • Details: Rolo was gifted to Katie's daughter, Princess, for her birthday. The dog died just a few weeks later after reportedly getting trapped under a chair, causing a public controversy over her care for pets.
  1. Queenie (Alsatian)
  • Cause of Death: Run over by a delivery driver in 2018.
  • Details: Queenie was tragically run over by a delivery van driver at Katie's home.
  1. Sparkle (Alsatian)
  • Cause of Death: Hit by a car in 2020.
  • Details: Sparkle was another one of her Alsatians and died after being struck by a vehicle.
  1. Bear (Chihuahua)
  • Cause of Death: Ran away and got hit by a car in 2023.
  • Details: Katie’s Chihuahua, Bear, reportedly ran away and was later found to have been hit by a car.
  1. Sharon (Pomeranian)
  • Cause of Death: Eaten by another dog in 2019.
  • Details: Sharon was attacked and killed by another one of Katie’s pets.

Horses

  1. Unnamed Horses
  • Cause of Death: Hit by a car.
  • Details: In 2017, two of Katie’s horses were killed in a car accident after escaping from her farm and running onto a nearby road.

Cats

  1. Hagrid (Cat)
  • Cause of Death: Hit by a car in 2018.
  • Details: Hagrid was struck by a car near her home, leading to his death.

Hedgehogs

  • Katie has also owned exotic pets like hedgehogs, though no specific reports of tragic deaths involving these creatures have been publicized.

Criticism and Pet Ownership Controversies

Katie Price has faced backlash and accusations of neglect following these incidents, with some animal rights groups and members of the public calling for her to be banned from owning more pets. Despite the string of accidents, Katie has continued to keep pets, and the incidents have been widely covered by the media, adding to the controversy surrounding her pet ownership.

This list may not include every pet Katie Price has owned, but it covers many of the more widely reported tragedies.

Finally, in 2022, the animal rights organization PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) offered Katie Price £5,000 to sign an agreement promising that she would stop adopting any more animals. This came after a series of tragic incidents involving her pets, many of which died under unfortunate circumstances. PETA voiced concerns over Katie Price’s ability to care for her pets, given the repeated accidents and deaths, and made the offer as part of their efforts to prevent further harm to animals in her care.

PETA's UK director, Elisa Allen, expressed the organization’s concerns publicly, and this offer attracted significant media attention. Katie Price did not accept the offer, and the situation fuelled ongoing controversy regarding her pet ownership.

Price is a menace to companion dogs and cats and exotic pets. She does need to be stopped. And to spend £8,000 on a cat companion when you are bankrupt should have been prevented. I think she will be criticised by a judge for that incredibly poor decision. I feel for the cat. I hope he/she survives.

Her previous Sphynx was euthanised at a relatively young age because of a neurological disorder. What was that about?!

Where does Katie Price currently live?


As of recent reports, Katie Price currently lives in her home in Horsham, West Sussex, England, which is often referred to as the "Mucky Mansion" due to its rundown state in the past. The house has gained media attention over the years because of its disrepair and various controversies. 

In 2022, Katie began renovating the property as part of a reality TV series called "Katie Price’s Mucky Mansion", which aired on Channel 4. The show followed her efforts to restore and transform the mansion into a family home, showcasing various home improvements and personal touches she made throughout the process. 

The mansion is situated in a rural area, with extensive grounds, and was originally worth millions, though it fell into disrepair before Katie's renovation efforts. Despite financial struggles and legal issues, the mansion remains her primary residence.

----------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also, sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. And, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable. Finally, (!) I often express an OPINION on the news. Please share yours in a comment.

Wednesday, 25 September 2024

Kind people are seen as more physically attractive than unkind people

A study has come to the conclusion that kind people are seen as more physically attractive than people who are unkind. There are nonphysical factors which can influence the way people look to others in terms of their attractiveness or unattractiveness. It isn't just about physical features and what society deems to be attractive or unattractive which is another story because these will be conventional viewpoints.


Obviously character does have an impact upon whether others perceive a person as attractive or not. And money can have an influence as well! But that's another story. This research's objective was to "unpick some of the non-physical factors that lead an individual to be perceived as good-looking." The quote comes from The Times, the source of this article.

The researchers came to the conclusion that "being thought intelligent or funny can increase an individual's aesthetic appeal. But being perceived as generous and altruistic beat both of those traits in boosting attractiveness."

Dr. Natalia Kononov, of Tel Aviv University, Israel, who led the research, said: "We discovered that people who are kind to others are judged as more beautiful. So beauty really isn't just skin deep. Being a good person can make you look better too."

The research was based upon 10 experiments involving more than 4000 participants. The results were clear according to The Times report. People considered to have "prosocial" traits i.e. kind, helpful and generous, were consistently judged better looking.

The study worked like this. The participants were first given a verbal description of a person. Let's call them Person A. One group was told that Person A had volunteered at a soup kitchen or helped package food for the needy. A second group were told that Person A lacked prosocial elements.

The participants were then introduced to Person A physically and asked to judge their attractiveness on a scale of 1 meaning not beautiful at all to 7 meaning very beautiful. Those who had been described as prosocial were consistently ranked more highly in terms of looks. They scored about 10% higher than those who had been described as funny and about 7% higher than those that were described as being clever.

Sidebar: here is Cilla Black singing about being kind! I love this song as do millions of others:



Dr. Natalia said: "We did expect to see a connection between prosocial behaviour and attractiveness, but we were surprised by how consistently the effect held across both men and women, whether they were the ones being judged or doing the judging."

She added that, "Being helpful, generous and cooperative is beneficial in social and survival context. These traits signal that someone could be a reliable, long-term partner."

And on that basis, they become more attractive because they are a better partner and someone to live with and more likely to survive and live a better life.

The results were published in the British Journal of Social Psychology.

They decided that "This finding opens the door to a broader question about which traits people prioritise when evaluating others. While our study doesn't directly answer that question it does suggest that at least when it comes to beauty evaluations kindness carries more weight than we might have assumed."


---------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Infographic on the benefits to very ill kids of 'virtual' animal-assisted pen pal intervention

The infographic says it! This is a cross-post to spread the word a little wider. 💖You can read more on this by clicking on this link:  Seriously ill children benefit from having a cat or dog ‘pen pal’. Infographic. Any study which assists very sick children to get better and feel better gets my backing. All healthy and relatively wealthy people have a duty to assist those less fortunate. It is the way to improve a world that desperately needs improving.

“There is something just so unconditional about the love of an animal and the listening that an animal can provide. They don’t argue, they don’t question; they just listen and validate.” - Anne Ingalls Gillespie at the University of Colorado, a former paediatric nurse.

-----------

Study citation: Gillespie AI, Jones J, Johnson-Koenke R, Gilmer MJ, Neu M. Influences of Animal-Assisted Intervention With Canine and Feline Pen Pals on Experiences of Living With Cancer and Blood Disorders in Children and Adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Nursing. 2024;41(4):252-264. doi:10.1177/27527530241246249


----------


P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Tuesday, 24 September 2024

Cats have more rights in terms of freedoms than women in Afghanistan says Meryl Streep

NEWS AND OPINION: I cannot avoid expressing my strong opinion about the highly objectionable way the Taliban suppress and in effect incarcerate women and girls in Afghanistan. It is monstrous misogynism of the most heinous kind. The world should be up in arms about it. The world can get together; should get together to stop this.


Meryl Streep is an intelligent and gentle woman and in this video - which has gone viral - she gently chides Afghanistan's Taliban leaders about the way they suffocate women and girls in their country. They have stripped away all their rights to the point, according to Meryl Streep, where girls and women have less rights in terms of freedoms than domestic cats in Afghanistan. She was speaking at an event on ‘The Inclusion of Women in the Future of Afghanistan’.

There are 2 play buttons in the infographic in order to play the vide embedded in it.
And today a female cat has more freedoms than a woman. Meryl Streep. by Michael Broad

--------------

It would seem to me that women and girls in Afghanistan have lost almost all their rights. There is nothing left to strip away other than the right to feed themselves and breathe the air.

And remember, the Taliban said that they would respect women's rights when they took over the country after America and its Western allies vacated the place in acknowledgement that they had failed. But during the occupation by Western forces, women and girls in Afghanistan enjoyed much greater freedoms and rights. The Taliban and their oppressive attitudes towards women and misogynism removed them all.

Women enjoyed a normal life for a time. They were able to express their views and have a sense of equality and then suddenly it was all removed when the Taliban broke their promises. They are an insidiously disrespectful lot of misogynists in my honest opinion.

They cannot be trusted. It would appear that their attitudes about women are so backward that it is hard to know from which era they come or is it purely about a distortion of the Islamic faith (see link below). Perhaps during humankind's evolution when they were living in caves as Neanderthals, men treated women as the Taliban treat women today. But I suspect even the Neanderthals treated women far better than the Taliban treat Afghanistan's women today.

Good on Meryl Streep. She believes that more pressure needs to be applied to the Taliban to change their ways. I don't think the world can accept it. The world needs to intervene. Governments these days are frightened to intervene in these situations. They think it always leads to failure. They've been burnt in the past. Look at Iraq and Vietnam for instance. And Afghanistan is an example of Western failure in intervention. Although on different matters. America tried to change the culture in Afghanistan and did so while they were there.

But I don't think a history of failure should prevent people from trying to change gross misdeeds in one country in the future. We must maintain optimism and commitment to improving the world. We should not accept appalling behaviour in one country. The Taliban will argue that other countries should respect their culture. I get that. We should respect the culture of other countries.

But when that culture is so oppressive of human rights to women the rules change. You cannot respect a culture which is so diabolical that domestic cats have greater freedoms than women and girls.

One last point: I suspect that domestic cats live a pretty difficult life in Afghanistan. The country is relatively poor and animal welfare organisations run by Westerners disappeared from that country when the Taliban took over. I don't think that the Taliban have any great respect for animals. They probably abuse and use them in the same way that they abuse and use women.

I suspect that the concept of animal welfare animal rights do not enter the heads of Taliban leaders judging by the way they treat their women and girls. This despite the fact that the hadiths of the Quran demand that Muslims respect cats.

My gut feeling is that cats have almost no rights. And yet they have more rights than female humans.

Reasons for existence of misogyny


I asked AI (ChatGPT) about why this misogynism exists. These views come from the internet in general. I don't necessarily hold these views. For me it is more about male power. I asked AI about that and you can see the response lower down.

Misogynistic behaviour within any cultural or racial group is a complex issue influenced by various factors. It's essential to approach this topic with sensitivity and an understanding that misogyny can exist in different forms across all cultures, not limited to any particular race or ethnicity. Here are some key factors that can contribute to misogynistic behaviour:

1. Historical Context: Many societies have a long history of patriarchal structures that prioritize male authority and dominance. These historical power dynamics can shape attitudes toward gender roles and contribute to ongoing misogyny.

2. Cultural Norms and Values: Cultural beliefs and practices can play a significant role in shaping gender relations. Societies that emphasize traditional gender roles often foster environments where misogynistic attitudes are normalized.

3. Socialization and Education: From a young age, individuals are socialized into their cultural norms, which can include harmful stereotypes and attitudes toward women. Education systems that reinforce these stereotypes contribute to the perpetuation of misogyny.

4. Media Representation: The portrayal of women in media—whether in television, films, music, or literature—can reflect and reinforce misogynistic attitudes. Negative stereotypes and objectification of women can shape societal views on gender.

5. Economic Factors: Economic inequality and dependency can exacerbate misogynistic behaviour. In cultures where women have limited access to education and economic opportunities, traditional gender roles may be more pronounced.

6. Religious Beliefs: In some cultures, religious teachings may promote patriarchal views or limit the roles of women in society. Interpretations of religious texts can influence attitudes toward gender equality.

7. Fear of Change: As societies evolve and gender roles shift, some individuals may react defensively, leading to an increase in misogynistic behaviour as a way to reassert traditional power dynamics.

8. Peer Influence: Social groups and peer pressure can reinforce misogynistic attitudes, particularly among men. Group dynamics can lead to the normalization of derogatory language and behaviour toward women.

9. Psychological Factors: Individual psychological issues, such as insecurity or a need for control, can also manifest in misogynistic behaviour. These issues can be compounded by societal norms that condone or encourage such attitudes.

10. Intersectionality: It’s important to consider how race, class, sexuality, and other identities intersect to shape experiences and attitudes. Misogyny may be expressed differently across different communities and can be exacerbated by factors such as racism and economic inequality.

Addressing misogyny requires a multifaceted approach that includes education, challenging cultural norms, promoting gender equality, and fostering dialogue within communities. Engaging with these issues critically and empathetically can help combat misogyny and promote a more equitable society.

Is one reason to do with male power?


Yes, male power is indeed a significant factor contributing to misogynistic behaviour within many cultures. Here are several ways in which male power influences misogyny:

1. Patriarchy: Many societies are structured around patriarchal systems that prioritize male authority and dominance in various aspects of life, including family, politics, and the workplace. This power structure often leads to the marginalization of women and reinforces misogynistic attitudes.

2. Control and Dominance: Misogyny can manifest as an expression of control or dominance over women. When men feel their power or status is threatened, they may resort to misogynistic behaviours as a way to reassert their authority.

3. Socialization of Masculinity: Many cultures socialize men to adhere to traditional notions of masculinity, which often include traits like aggression, control, and emotional suppression. These traits can contribute to misogynistic behaviour, as men may feel pressured to demonstrate their power through dominance over women.

4. Fear of Vulnerability: The societal expectation for men to be strong and dominant can lead to a fear of vulnerability. In this context, women may be viewed as threats to male power, leading to hostile attitudes and behaviours aimed at maintaining control.

5. Economic Power: Economic inequalities often mean that men hold more financial power, which can lead to controlling behaviours in relationships and contribute to the perception of women as dependent or subordinate.

6. Exclusion from Power Structures: Women's historical exclusion from positions of power—whether in government, business, or religious institutions—perpetuates male dominance and reinforces the idea that men should control societal norms and values, including those related to gender.

7. Reinforcement of Gender Roles: Male power often reinforces rigid gender roles, where men are seen as leaders and providers while women are relegated to supportive or subordinate roles. This dynamic can foster resentment and hostility toward women who challenge these roles.

8. Cultural Narratives: Many cultures have narratives that glorify male power and aggression while devaluing female strength and independence. These narratives can normalize misogyny and legitimize male dominance.

Addressing misogyny rooted in male power involves challenging these societal structures, promoting gender equality, and redefining notions of masculinity to be more inclusive and respectful of women's rights and autonomy.

Islamic Faith


There is also a strong Islamic faith context here as women are very much in the shadow of men in Muslim countries. Also the Taliban exercise a very extreme version of the Islamic faith. But they use the faith to exercise control and power over women as they fear them in that if women are given equal rights it will undermine the male dominance over Afghan society. And of course the men use force to maintain this absolute control over women all of which is totally unacceptable by normal Western values.



------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Monday, 23 September 2024

Infographic explains the basic differences between cat and human sleep

This is a cross-post as I think it is a quite important topic for cat caregivers.


-----------

I did this because there are lots of articles on the internet telling us that cats sleep 18 hours a day or more. Not true really. They nap for a lot of the time but this is not really sleeping. I hope this infographic straightens out some misleading thoughts. 


-----------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Rory McIlroy lost the BMW PGA Championship because he doesn't have a 3-iron

Once again, this is nothing to do with cats 😎 but I played a lot of golf in my youth and got quite good at it. Golf followers know that Rory McIlroy lost the BMW PGA Championship this Sunday to an eagle in a play-off with Billy Horschel. However, in my opinion, he lost the championship on the 18th hole of the fourth round; the final hole of the championship proper before the play-off.

He hit a three wood off the tee to the middle of the fairway to directly attack the large green which is over water. As I recall, it was about a 250+ yard carry into a slight wind. Here is the shot.


Rory, as I further understand it, carries a driver, then a three wood, and then a four iron. And then the usual irons and I presume a few wedges. He does not carry a three iron.

He hit his four iron as hard as he could and in doing so overhit it slightly and mistimed the shot slightly. The shot was hooked and it fell short of the water in the rough. He was fortunate because it was destined for the water.

But, if he had carried a three iron he would have carried it onto the green in my honest opinion. This would have left two putts for a birdie to win the championship. In the event, he pitched from the rough onto the green over the water leaving himself about 15 feet from the hole with a tricky left to right putt which he missed.

In the play-off he did the same thing again but the 4-iron was adequate because his 3-wood tee shot was a little further down the fairway as he carried it over the trees to cut off the corner.  He could get a four iron home from there. If Rory McIlroy had carried a 3-iron he would have won.

P.S. Billy putted superbly throughout the tournament and that last putt to win was destined for the hole. He was awesome.

-----------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Sunday, 22 September 2024

Infographic will change your mind about ancient Egyptians loving cats


Below the infographic I briefly touch on the ancient Egyptian paradox of both admiring and respecting the cat while abusing the animal. And other animals all in the name of worshipping the Gods and asking for favours. They were a very superstitious race. Many people still are. 😢😉

-------------------

The ancient Egyptians had a deep admiration for cats, considering them sacred animals. Cats were valued for their ability to protect homes and granaries by hunting mice, rats, and snakes, which helped safeguard food supplies. Over time, cats became associated with divine protection and were linked to the goddess Bastet, who was the goddess of home, fertility, and protection, often depicted as a lioness or a woman with a cat's head.

The reverence for cats was so strong that they were often mummified and buried with their owners, and killing a cat—even accidentally—was punishable by death. Cats also featured in Egyptian art and religious rituals, showing how highly they were regarded. 

This admiration contributed to the spread of domestic cats throughout the world, as they became popular trade goods and companions for many cultures.

Paradoxically, while the Egyptians deeply revered cats, they also bred them specifically for sacrificial purposes. This practice emerged alongside the religious veneration of Bastet, the feline goddess of home, fertility, and protection. Worshippers would offer mummified cats as votive offerings at her temples, hoping to gain the favour of the goddess.

Archaeological evidence suggests that during certain periods, particularly from around 600 BCE onwards, there were large-scale breeding facilities dedicated to raising cats for this very purpose. Once these cats were killed (often humanely, though not always), they were mummified and offered in temples as a means of devotion. Millions of cat mummies have been found in Egypt, particularly in Bubastis, the center of Bastet worship, and other major temple sites.

While the act of breeding cats for sacrifice might seem contradictory to their revered status, it fits within the broader context of Egyptian religious practices, where offerings to gods—whether food, animals, or objects—were a fundamental way to show devotion. The cat's sacred status didn't prevent this practice, but rather made them more suitable for offerings to please Bastet and other deities. This juxtaposition illustrates the Egyptians' unique blend of spiritual reverence and ritual practices.

It was not just cats that were abused. Eight million jackals where offered to the Gods as mummies and buried in cemeteries in Egypt. It was mass slaughter.

-----------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

CCTV pictures of a woman who burgled a house and stole three cats accompanied by four children!

This story comes from Clitheroe, Lancashire, UK. It's rather sad because a mother who needs to be identified by the police burgled a home and stole three cats from that home while being accompanied by four children.

It appears, and this is the allegation, that she took her four children into this home and allowed them to watch her theft of three cats. That, I think you would agree, is highly irresponsible for the fact that it's a crime and that it might teach children about criminal behaviour.

The police have issued the CCTV photograph that you see on this page and ask people to notify them if they recognise the woman.

CCTV pictures of a woman who burgled a house and stole three kittens accompanied by four children!
CCTV image: Source: local police force.

CCTV pictures of a woman who burgled a house and stole three kittens accompanied by four children!
CCTV image: Source: local police force.

The story is that she and her children left in a vehicle down Lowergate in the direction of Highfield Road, Clitheroe, UK, at around 1 PM on Tuesday, September 3. They burgled a home on Moor Lane.

The strange and probably remarkable fact about the story is that the mother took her four children along with her when she burgled the home. We don't know more but the pictures are good enough to identify her.

Another strange aspect of the stories that the police historically have showed a complete disinterest in investigating burglaries in the UK. This has been the status quo for very many years, which is why there are more burglars than the should be in the country. Although burglary is less profitable to criminals than online fraud.

In this story we have to think about the cats as well and the owner of the cats. These cats have been taken from their home range, their home, and they will be disturbed and frightened. And of course the owner will be distraught if he or she is any good at their job of domestic cat caregiving.

There is a very strong emotional distress element to cat and dog theft by which I mean the caregiver can suffer tremendously for a very long time. This makes the theft of a sentient being more important to police than an inanimate object, I would argue.

In the UK, the theft of domestic animals has increased. It's quite a profitable form of criminality. Sometimes animals are stolen to breed which of course depends upon whether they can breed i.e. whether they be neutered or not.

I suspect that this woman has in mind breeding cats to make some money. She might have known that the cats had not been spayed or neutered. You see a lot of kittens for sale on social media from unscrupulous sellers. Sometimes the prices are inordinately high for non-purebred cats.

It depends on the appearance. If the kittens look great then people are more prepared to pay good money for them even if they are not purebred. Humans are very much focused on appearance. And sometimes unscrupulous people sell random bread cats as purebred cats.

That said, it's entirely possible that the three stolen cats are in fact purebred. I made the presumption that they weren't but I could be wrong.

------------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Saturday, 21 September 2024

Lost Siamese cat walks 900 miles home from Yellowstone National Park to Roseville California

The domestic cat's astonishing navigation abilities combined with their natural homing instinct and enormous persistence have appeared to combined in compelling this Siamese cat to go home from Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming to Roseville, California; a journey of about 900 miles and his owner believes that he did it all on his own. His owner believes that he he was not transported in a vehicle but simply made his way home after he got lost on a camping trip to that wonderful park.


Note: you can see that Beau has a slight squint which is typical of Siamese cats. Reason? Click this to find out.

Lost Siamese cat walks 900 miles home from Yellowstone National Park to Roseville California
Image: MikeB made with images from Sky News.

His name is Rayne Beau which I think is a very clever name because it is a take on the word "rainbow". And interestingly, his owners, Benny and Suzanne Anguiano, saw a rainbow on their way home from Yellowstone National Park to their home in Salinas having searched high and low for their beloved cat. They took the rainbow as a sign that Beau would come home.

They Beau him and his twin sister to Yellowstone's Fishing Bridge RV Park on June 4. This was the cats' first trip to the forest.

The holiday ended badly because Rayne Beau ran off into the wilds of the park and couldn't be found. The couple searched for four days but with heavy hearts they returned home to Salinas, California.

They didn't give up hope and fortunately Beau was micro-chipped and in August the couple received a surprise phone call from the microchip company. They were told that Beau was safe and well at the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Roseville, California.

That's about 200 miles from their home and they drove to the shelter to collect him. Apparently a woman saw Beau wandering the streets of Roseville. They fed him and gave him water until is they managed to catch him on the 3rd August and then took him to the shelter.

Beau had lost 6 pounds which apparently is about 40% of his body weight and his protein levels were low due to inadequate nutrition. His paws were very sore. These are the reasons why Ms Anguianos believes that Beau walked all the way back without help.

They've now fitted him with a GPS tracker and I have to say that this is not the first instance on a domestic cat making a remarkable return home using their natural navigation abilities.


And about the wild cats:


--------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Friday, 20 September 2024

The Kiffness performs viral ‘eating the cats' track live in Munich. More pain for Trump.

The Kiffness is a talented South African musician renown for this satirical music. He has latched onto Trump's egg-on-the-face rant about Haitian migrants eating cats and made a funny song about it. More pain for Trump.


"My initial desire to remix the quote was because I thought it was amusing and outlandish, but I also recognized the melodic element to the statement. I decided to give it a shot and I had the basic idea for the song in a matter of minutes," The Kiffness told Newsweek of his inspiration to remix the line from the debate.

Here is a video on this:


About The Kiffness

The Kiffness is the stage name of David Scott, a South African musician, producer, and internet personality, renowned for his satirical, humorous, and socially conscious music content. He gained widespread fame through his innovative remixes of viral internet videos, as well as his original songs and clever musical parodies.

Key Facts about The Kiffness:

  • Full Name: David Scott
  • Born: 1988, in Cape Town, South Africa
  • Education: Studied jazz at Rhodes University in South Africa
  • Musical Style: Primarily electronic, with influences from jazz, house, funk, and pop

Early Life and Career

David Scott was musically inclined from a young age, learning piano and trumpet. He formed The Kiffness in 2011, initially as a live electronic act that performed energetic house and electronic dance music (EDM) at various festivals and events. "Kiff" is South African slang for "cool" or "awesome," which reflects the fun, positive, and lighthearted nature of his musical persona.

Over time, Scott's music evolved to incorporate more humor and social commentary, often addressing political and societal issues in South Africa. This shift in tone helped him gain more widespread attention, as he used his platform to speak out on issues like government corruption, load shedding (power cuts), and social inequalities.

Rise to Fame with Viral Internet Videos

The Kiffness skyrocketed to global recognition by remixing viral internet content, often featuring animals, news clips, and quirky internet personalities. His most well-known viral remixes include songs featuring meowing cats, yodeling goats, and quirky interviews. These videos not only display his musical creativity but also his ability to adapt viral trends into humorous, catchy songs.

In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns, his unique remixes, especially those incorporating viral animal videos, found a huge audience online. The popularity of these videos led to massive growth on platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and TikTok.

One of his standout collaborations is the remix of a popular Russian cat video, where a cat meows in a distinct rhythmic pattern, and The Kiffness adds layers of instrumental and vocal harmonies, creating a viral hit.

Social Commentary and Satire

David Scott frequently uses his platform to make biting social commentary on political and social issues, both in South Africa and globally. His humor is sharp and often takes aim at government corruption, corporate greed, and environmental issues, but he always manages to balance it with light-heartedness and wit.

For example, he created a satirical song about South Africa's frequent power outages due to Eskom, the country's electricity supplier, and he has voiced his frustrations with governmental mismanagement in a way that resonates with many South Africans.

Activism and Advocacy

Beyond humor and satire, Scott is also vocal about issues he cares about, such as animal rights, environmental conservation, and promoting fairness in the music industry. He has advocated for fair compensation for musicians and transparency in the streaming industry, criticizing unfair royalty payouts from platforms like Spotify.

Personal Life

David Scott is married to Jute Scott, who is also part of The Kiffness’s videos and acts as a behind-the-scenes collaborator on many projects. He is based in Cape Town, South Africa, and continues to produce content that blends music, humor, and social awareness.

Impact and Legacy

The Kiffness has not only entertained millions worldwide with his catchy remixes and satirical content but has also managed to turn viral trends into meaningful social commentary. His ability to mix humor, music, and activism has solidified him as one of South Africa's most prominent internet personalities and a global viral sensation.

His work exemplifies how internet culture and music can merge to create viral, impactful content that transcends language and cultural barriers, making him a unique and influential figure in both the South African and global music scenes.

--------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are written at breakneck speed using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. Also, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable.

Featured Post

i hate cats

i hate cats, no i hate f**k**g cats is what some people say when they dislike cats. But they nearly always don't explain why. It appe...

Popular posts