Jason Arday ensured he continued to make waves after his death

The world knows about Jason Arday, the MacBeth-like figure who reached for the stars and got burnt in the harsh spotlight of the news media thanks to his fantastic CV which proved to be less than truthful.

Part of his story is his death. Of course I am very sympathetic to his family and like almost all others see his suicide as a tragedy. But without being too cynical I believe that a major reason why he took his own life was to make a statement and continue to have an influence after his death. It is part of his story. 

He knew that if he killed himself there would be uproar in some quarters and he was right because his supporters are now demanding a public enquiry about the so called harassment he endured when alive.

The 'harassment' refers to press reporting including from The Times newspaper which is known for its integrity and accuracy. Anti-racist campaigners are exploiting his death I would argue in an unconscionable way.

This was not and is not harassment but factual, sensitive reporting of the story of a fantasist who reached too far, was too ambitious and found that when he reached the peak of academia he was unqualified to keep the job. Of course he could not keep the job: he was not a true academic. He created this persona. A fake person really.

He was a poor professor. His lectures, according to accounts, were poor and he often turned up late. Probably because he dreaded doing the effing lecture as he could not do it!

I have decided that he came to the grisly and shocking conclusion that the best way he could 'beat' his detractors was to kill himself. He knew that would create waves, big time. And it did.

He wanted to continue to make ripples after his passing. He was successful. Arday was talented but not as an academic. He could have achieved a lot in another line of work. Shame.

He wanted to prove that black men and women can be successful in the ivory towers of top academia. For a while he was on the mountain top. Perhaps that was enough for him.

There is a campaign now to characterise the news media's reporting on Jaspn Arday as racism. I read the Times newspaper and I never saw anything remotely resembling racism. Just honest reporting. And the same for the other newspapers I read. 

If blame is to be apportioned the university must take their share of the blame for being duped by Arday and Arday himself. He was the author of his own demise. And Cambridge University used Arday as a poster boy for diversity. This was another example woke gone mad leading to tragedy.

Post his death his name has been hijacked by racist campaigners to promote their cause. Fine but this is exploiting Arday again. First Cambridge University exploited him and now many others are also exploiting his name in an immoral way I would argue.

---------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are often written at breakneck speed, sometimes using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also, sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. And, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable. Finally, (!) I often express an OPINION on the news. Please share yours in a comment.

Nine Months vs. 14 Years: How Ukraine Shamed Whitehall

We are witnessing the absolute death of traditional military procurement. If you want proof of how utterly broken, bloated, and unfit for purpose the Western defence establishment has become, look no further than a comparison between Ukraine’s rapid-fire innovation and the British Ministry of Defence’s crown jewel of incompetence: the Ajax armoured vehicle. One is a masterclass in how raw necessity breeds terrifyingly efficient invention. The other is a £4 billion national embarrassment. 

Britain's MOD is an example - a good one - of broken Britain. A complete disaster. A moribund organisation on its knees. A failure. Horrible and irritating to millions of British citizens but a source of great amusement to Putin and his cronies! Too many idiot generals swanning around in their chauffer-driven cars doing nothing useful.

Ukraine's Flamingo cruise missile, born out of necessity and with great invention and efficiency.

Look at the clock. Ukraine’s defence start-up, Fire Point, designed, built, and launched the FP-5 Flamingo cruise missile into active combat in less than nine months. Let that sink in. Under a constant rain of Russian bombs, Ukrainian engineers went from a blank sheet of paper to a battle-ready, deep-strike weapon. Meanwhile, Whitehall’s soggy, paper-shuffling bureaucracy has dragged the Ajax project out for over 14 years. First signed in 2010, the project is still stuck in endless trials. British frontline soldiers won't see a fully deployable unit until late 2028 at the absolute earliest.

The financial contrast is even more infuriating. Each Ukrainian Flamingo costs an incredibly lean £470,000 ($600,000). They didn't reinvent the wheel; they used commercial ingenuity, weaving lightweight carbon-fibre hulls and salvaging old, Soviet-era turbofan jet engines. They built exactly what they needed to get the job done. Now look at the British MoD, which has blindly flushed £4 billion of taxpayer money down the toilet out of a massive £5.5 billion budget. With only a handful of vehicles actually delivered for testing, each single Ajax vehicle effectively costs over £6.7 million. It is a grotesque waste of public money.

But the real tragedy is the sheer lack of effectiveness. The Flamingo is an actual weapon of war, currently devastating targets up to 3,000 kilometres away. It bypassed radar, flew deep into Russia, and successfully blew up a critical rocket manufacturing plant in Samara. It works. The Ajax, on the other hand, spent years being an expensive, high-tech death-trap for its own crew. Because the hull was built too rigidly, it vibrated like a violent jackhammer at speed. Instead of terrorizing the enemy, it gave British test soldiers severe hearing loss, swollen joints, and spinal injuries. The MoD claims it is finally fixed, but the vehicle remains completely unproven in actual combat.

The reason for this chasm in performance comes down to culture. The British MoD is trapped in a gold-plated procurement nightmare. They suffer from terminal "requirements creep"—constantly changing their minds, adding endless layers of complex electronics, and kowtowing to corporate defense giants until the final product is heavy, broken, and a decade too late.

Ukraine doesn't have the luxury of time or endless billions. Necessity has forced them to adopt a radically decentralized, highly commercial procurement model. They empower fast-moving startups and private tech companies to build fast and break things. They cut out the red tape, bypass the corporate grifters, and test prototypes directly on the front lines within weeks.

The lesson is staring us right in the face. Throwing billions at a slow, soggy bureaucracy does not guarantee security. In modern warfare, speed and agility beat bloated budgets every single time. It's time for the UK to burn down its outdated procurement system and learn from the people actually fighting—and winning—a 21st-century tech war.

---------------------

P.S. please forgive the occasional typo. These articles are often written at breakneck speed, sometimes using Dragon Dictate. I have to prepare them in around 20 mins. Also, sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified. And, I rely on scientific studies but they are not 100% reliable. Finally, (!) I often express an OPINION on the news. Please share yours in a comment.